Detection of the presence of the RHD gene, the C and/or E alleles of the RHCE gene in maternal plasma samples is highly accurate and enables implementation in a clinical diagnostic algorithm for following pregnancies at risk for HDN. The absence of RHD gene, the C and/or E alleles of RHCE gene in the current pregnancy excludes the risk of HDN caused by anti-D, anti-C and/or anti-E alloantibodies and the performance of invasive fetal-blood sampling.
Perfect maternal diabetes compensation is crucial for the outcome of the baby. However, little is known how hyperglycaemia influences the specific immune response. Furthermore, babies of type 1 diabetes (T1D) mothers have less risk of development T1D than babies with a T1D father. This study aimed to analyze the effect of maternal hyperglycaemia on newborns with focus on the response to diabetes‐associated autoantigens. Populations: (1) Newborns of T1D mothers split into groups according to maternal diabetes compensation during the 3rd trimester: perfect (n = 15) or acceptable (n = 25) compensation. (2) newborns with T1D father (n = 12) (3) newborns with a mother treated for either gestational or type 2 diabetes (n = 10) (4) control newborns (n = 25). Spontaneous as well as diabetes‐associated autoantigen‐stimulated production of 23 cytokines and chemokines were tested using protein microarray. In addition, the influence of glucose on cytokine and chemokine responsiveness was analyzed in vitro. The study groups differed in their spontaneous as well as stimulated cytokine and chemokine spectra. A prominent Th1 response (high IFN‐gamma) from autoantigen stimulation was observed especially in babies of T1D fathers (P = 0.001) and also in mothers with perfect diabetes compensation during the 3rd trimester (P = 0.016) in comparison with control newborns. By contrast, cord blood mononuclear cells cultivated in vitro in high glucose concentration decreased the diabetogenic stimulated Th1 cytokine response. Maternal ‘sweet’ as well as ‘autoimmune environment’ may both lead to lower occurrence of T1D within their offspring. Further studies will reveal the exact immunological mechanism of this observation.
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a great medical challenge and its incidence rises rapidly. T lymphocytes and their cytokine production are supposed to play a major role in T1D development. So far, there is no potent tool to recognize the early signs of cellular auto‐reactivity which leads to β‐cell damage. The naïve immune system of the newborn (not yet influenced by external factors) can be used as an important model for T1D pathogenesis studies. Cord blood samples of 22 healthy neonates born at term to a diabetic parent (T1DR) and 15 newborns with no family history of any autoimmune disease (controls) were collected. Determination of 23 cytokines was performed before and after the stimulation with diabetogenic autoantigens using protein microarray. We observed lower basal production of all detected cytokines in the T1DR group – granulocyte/macrophage colony‐stimulating factor (GM‐CSF) (P = 0.025), growth regulated protein (GRO) (P = 0.002), GRO‐α (P = 0.027), interleukin (IL)‐1‐α (P = 0.051), IL‐3 (P = 0.008), IL‐7 (P = 0.027), IL‐8 (P = 0.042), monocyte chemoattractant proteins (MCP)‐3 (P = 0.022), monokine‐induced by IFN‐γ (MIG) (P = 0.034) and regulated upon activation normal T‐cell express sequence (RANTES) (P = 0.004). Exclusively lower post‐stimulative levels of G‐CSF (P = 0.030) and GRO‐α (P = 0.04) were observed in controls in comparison with the basal levels. A significant post‐stimulative decrease in G‐CSF (P = 0.030) and MCP‐2 (P = 0.009) levels was observed in controls in comparison with T1DR neonates. We also observed the interesting impact of the risky genotype on the protein microarray results. Protein microarray seems to be a useful tool to characterize a risk pattern of the immune response for T1D also in newborns.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.