ABSTRAKPerkembangan politik hukum agraria di Indonesia tidak terlepas dari kebijakan pemerintahan yang berkuasa pada setiap periode pemerintahan. Periode perkembangannya dapat dibagi menjadi 4 {empat} masa yaitu masa kolonial, masa pemerintahan Soekarno, masa pemerintahan Soeharto dan masa Reformasi. Pasca reformasi, beberapa kali pergantian presiden yaitu Habibie, Gusdur, Megawati dan Susilo Bambang Yudoyono kebijakan terhadap pengaturan keagrariaan dan sumber daya alam tidak terlihat secara nyata sebagai implementasi terhadap pelaksanaan Tap MPR No IX / Tahun 2001. Wacana terkait dengan perubahan pengaturan keagrariaan sudah diwacanakan namun tidak terlaksana secara maksimal.Saat ini pemerintahan Indonesia sedang dipimpin oleh Presiden Joko Widodo berupaya untuk melaksanakan perubahan terhadap politik hukum keagrariaan di Indonesia. Kata Kunci : Reforma Agraria sebagai kebijakan keagrariaan masa pemerintahan Joko Widodo ABSTRACT The political development of agrarian law in Indonesia is inseparable from the policies of the ruling government in each period of government. The period of development can be divided into 4 {four} periods, namely the colonial period, the Soekarno administration, the Soeharto era and the Reformation period. After the reformation, several presidential changes, namely Habibie, Gusdur, Megawati and Susilo Bambang Yudoyono, policies on the regulation of natural resources and resources are not clearly seen as the implementation of TAP MPR No. IX / 2001. Discourse related to changes in diagrammatic arrangements has been discussed but not implemented optimally. At present the Indonesian government is being led by President Joko Widodo trying to implement changes to the political law of diagramming in Indonesia.

It is estimated that the judicial system will not be able to meet the increasingly complex needs of society. This estimate is based on facts in the field. Dispute resolution through courts is considered too convoluted, takes a long time, and is inefficient for businesses that emphasize efficiency and effectiveness. Besides, the court's decision does not satisfy the parties. The principle of simple, fast, low-cost justice is still only a slogan.      Answering this problem, a study is conducted using the empirical normative legal research method with a study approach based on statutory regulations, conceptual approaches, and case approaches. Types and sources of data used in this study are primary data and secondary data with data collection techniques through document study and interviews, where the data obtained will be analyzed qualitatively deductively. Based on the results of research and discussion, it was found that mediation as a solution to the settlement of cases, both in court and outside the court, is cooperative

Advances in technology not only have a positive impact but technology can also have a negative impact on life, where technology is used as a means to commit crimes or criminal acts. If we look closely in the last few years, we are impressed and felt that people easily own firearms of various brands and types. People who have money can easily get, collect, even in an unnatural amount. It is easy for people to get firearms, of course, because the market has changed. At least, much different when compared to the decade around the 1980s. If in the past people were so proud to keep the FN rifle, now it is not so. The M-16, which is usually used on the battlefield by soldiers, has now entered the exclusive space of weapon collectors.To answer this problem, a normative legal research method is used with an approach study based on legislation, a conceptual approach. The types and sources of data used in this study are primary data and secondary data with data collection techniques through document studies where the data obtained will be analyzed deductively qualitatively. Based on the results of research and discussion that there are legal regulations in the form of regulations and procedures as well as the mechanism of the firearm licensing process