The mechanisms underlying nuclear body (NB) formation and their contribution to genome function are unknown. Here we examined the non-random positioning of Cajal bodies (CBs), major NBs involved in spliceosomal snRNP assembly and their role in genome organization. CBs are predominantly located at the periphery of chromosome territories at a multi-chromosome interface. Genome-wide chromosome conformation capture analysis (4C-seq) using CB-interacting loci revealed that CB-associated regions are enriched with highly expressed histone genes and U small nuclear or nucleolar RNA (sn/snoRNA) loci that form intra- and inter-chromosomal clusters. In particular, we observed a number of CB-dependent gene-positioning events on chromosome 1. RNAi-mediated disassembly of CBs disrupts the CB-targeting gene clusters and suppresses the expression of U sn/snoRNA and histone genes. This loss of spliceosomal snRNP production results in increased splicing noise, even in CB-distal regions. Therefore, we conclude that CBs contribute to genome organization with global effects on gene expression and RNA splicing fidelity.

Cells are segregated into two distinct compartment groups to optimize cellular function. The first is characterized by lipid membranes that encapsulate specific regions and regulate macromolecular flux. The second, known collectively as membraneless organelles (MLOs), lacks defining lipid membranes and exhibits self‐organizing properties. MLOs are enriched with specific RNAs and proteins that catalyze essential cellular processes. A prominent sub‐class of MLOs are known as nuclear bodies, which includes nucleoli, paraspeckles, and other droplets. These microenvironments contain specific RNAs, exhibit archetypal liquid–liquid phase separation characteristics, and harbor intrinsically disordered, multivalent hub proteins. We present an analysis of nuclear body protein disorder that suggests MLO proteomes are significantly more disordered than structured cellular features. We also outline common MLO ultrastructural features, exemplified by the three sub‐compartments present inside the nucleolus. A core‐shell configuration, or phase within a phase, is displayed by several nuclear bodies and may be functionally important. Finally, we summarize evidence indicating extensive RNA and protein sharing between distinct nuclear bodies, suggesting functional cooperation and similar nucleation principles. Considering the substantial accumulation of specific coding and noncoding RNA classes inside MLOs, evidence that RNA buffers specific phase transition events, and the absence of a clear correlation between total intrinsic protein disorder and MLO accumulation, we conclude that RNA biogenesis may play a key role in MLO formation, internal organization, and function. This article is categorized under: RNA Export and Localization > RNA Localization RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Protein–RNA Interactions: Functional Implications