Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is a genetically, physiologically, and phenotypically complex neurodegenerative disorder. This study addressed the expanding collection of genes associated with POAG, referred to as the “POAGome.” We used bioinformatics tools to perform an extensive, systematic literature search and compiled 542 genes with confirmed associations with POAG and its related phenotypes (normal tension glaucoma, ocular hypertension, juvenile open-angle glaucoma, and primary congenital glaucoma). The genes were classified according to their associated ocular tissues and phenotypes, and functional annotation and pathway analyses were subsequently performed. Our study reveals that no single molecular pathway can encompass the pathophysiology of POAG. The analyses suggested that inflammation and senescence may play pivotal roles in both the development and perpetuation of the retinal ganglion cell degeneration seen in POAG. The TGF-β signaling pathway was repeatedly implicated in our analyses, suggesting that it may be an important contributor to the manifestation of POAG in the anterior and posterior segments of the globe. We propose a molecular model of POAG revolving around TGF-β signaling, which incorporates the roles of inflammation and senescence in this disease. Finally, we highlight emerging molecular therapies that show promise for treating POAG.

BackgroundThe question of whether DNA obtained from saliva is an acceptable alternative to DNA from blood is a topic of considerable interest for large genetics studies. We compared the yields, quality and performance of DNAs from saliva and blood from a mostly elderly study population.MethodsTwo thousand nine hundred ten DNAs from primarily elderly subjects (mean age ± standard deviation (SD): 65 ± 12 years), collected for the Primary Open-Angle African-American Glaucoma Genetics (POAAGG) study, were evaluated by fluorometry and/or spectroscopy. These included 566 DNAs from blood and 2344 from saliva. Subsets of these were evaluated by Sanger sequencing (n = 1555), and by microarray SNP genotyping (n = 94) on an Illumina OmniExpress bead chip platform.ResultsThe mean age of subjects was 65, and 68 % were female in both the blood and saliva groups. The mean ± SD of DNA yield per ml of requested specimen was significantly higher for saliva (17.6 ± 17.8 μg/ml) than blood (13.2 ± 8.5 μg/ml), but the mean ± SD of total DNA yield obtained per saliva specimen (35 ± 36 μg from 2 ml maximum specimen volume) was approximately three-fold lower than from blood (106 ± 68 μg from 8 ml maximum specimen volume). The average genotyping call rates were >99 % for 43 of 44 saliva DNAs and >99 % for 50 of 50 for blood DNAs. For 22 of 23 paired blood and saliva samples from the same individuals, the average genotyping concordance rate was 99.996 %. High quality PCR Sanger sequencing was obtained from ≥ 98 % of blood (n = 297) and saliva (n = 1258) DNAs. DNA concentrations ≥10 ng/μl, corresponding to total yields ≥ 2 μg, were obtained for 94 % of the saliva specimens (n = 2344).ConclusionsIn spite of inferior purity, the performance of saliva DNAs for microarray genotyping was excellent. Our results agree with other studies concluding that saliva collection is a viable alternative to blood. The potential to boost study enrollments and reduce subject discomfort is not necessarily offset by a reduction in genotyping efficiency. Saliva DNAs performed comparably to blood DNAs for PCR Sanger sequencing.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12920-016-0172-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

No abstract