INTRODUCTION:When severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID19) require admission to the ICU, the presentation will often fulfill criteria for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Some studies have attempted to define the differences between COVID19 related ARDS and non-COVID19 ARDS. However, there is little data on differences in use of vascular access. While central and arterial lines are essential for ICU care, there are risks associated with their use, notably infection, bleeding, and thrombosis. This study attempts to explore if there were differences in line usage rates and complications between patients with COVID19 ARDS and non-COVID19 ARDS. METHODS: This analysis was a retrospective cohort study.A cohort of patients with COVID19 ARDS (n = 86) was compared to a cohort of patients with non-COVID19 ARDS (n = 47). We compared baseline characteristics, total number and placement rate of lines (arterial lines, central venous catheters, and dialysis catheters) and incidence of line related complications (bleed, thrombosis, or infection).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.