Background
There are no studies that have investigated the presence of yeasts in the subgingival oral biofilm (OB) of type‐2 diabetic and non‐diabetic patients with peri‐implantitis. The aim was to assess the presence of yeasts in the subgingival OB of patients with type 2 diabetes and peri‐implantitis and patients with peri‐implantitis without diabetes.
Methods
Patients with type 2 diabetes with peri‐implantitis (group A), non‐diabetic individuals with peri‐implantitis and without diabetes (group B), and individuals with and without peri‐implantitis (group C) were included. Lifestyle‐related and demographic data were collected using a questionnaire and hemoglobin A1c levels were measured. Peri‐implant plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), and probing depth (PD) were evaluated and crestal bone loss (CBL) were measured. Subgingival OB samples were collected and oral yeasts species were identified using ChromAgar medium. Level of significance was set at P <0.05.
Results
The mean age of individuals in groups A (n = 43), B (n = 41), and C (n = 42) were 55.6 ± 6.4, 54.6 ± 4.5, and 57.1 ± 3.3 years, respectively. The mean HbA1c levels were higher in group A (P <0.01) than groups B and C. Peri‐implant PI (P <0.01), BOP (P <0.01), PD (P <0.01), and CBL (P <0.01) were significantly higher in group A compared with patients in groups B and C. Peri‐implant PI (P <0.05), BOP (P <0.05), PD (P <0.05), and CBL (P <0.05) were significantly higher among patients in group B compared with group C. Subgingival yeasts were more often isolated from the OB of patients in groups A (74.4%) and B (46.3%) than group C (7.1%). The most common yeast species identified in all groups was Candida albicans. The CFU/mL for subgingival yeasts were higher in group A than groups B (P <0.01) and C (P <0.01). The CFU/mL for subgingival yeasts were higher in group B than group C (P <0.01).
Conclusion
Candida species (predominantly C. albicans) were more often present in the subgingival OB of patients with and without type 2 diabetes with peri‐implantitis than systemically healthy individuals without peri‐implant diseases.
Within the limitations of this study, endodontically treated teeth were successfully restored with indirect composite inlay and onlay restorations. However, the fractures that accompanied the inlay restorations were more severe and were unable to be restored.
The study aimed at synthesizing β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) nanoparticles and comparing the mechanical properties and dentin interaction of two adhesives: experimental adhesive (EA) and EA with 5 wt.% β-TCP nanoparticles (β-TCP-5%). These filler nanoparticles were synthesized and then characterized with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and micro-Raman spectroscopy. The β-TCP nanoparticles were incorporated in the adhesives to form two groups: gp-1: EA (control) and gp-2: β-TCP-5%. These adhesives were characterized by SEM, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectroscopy and were also assessed for their micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) with (TC) and without thermocycling (NTC). Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was performed to evaluate the degree of conversion (DC) of two adhesives. The β-TCP filler was seen as irregularly shaped agglomerates on SEM. The micro-Raman spectra revealed characteristic peaks associated with β-TCP nanoparticles. Both adhesives presented suitable dentin interaction, which was demonstrated by the formation of resin tags of variable depths. The EDX analysis verified the existence of calcium (Ca) and phosphate (P) for the β-TCP-5% group. The greatest μTBS values were shown by β-TCP-5% group samples when they were non-thermocycled (NTC) (β-TCP-5%-NTC: 34.11 ± 3.46) followed by the thermocycled (TC) samples of the same group (β-TCP-5%-TC: 30.38 ± 3.66), compared with the EA group. Although the DC presented by β-TCP-5% group was comparable to the EA group, it was still lower. The addition of β-TCP nanoparticles in the adhesive improved its μTBS and resulted in a suitable dentin interaction, seen in the form of hybrid layer and resin tag formation. Nonetheless, a decreased DC was observed for the β-TCP-5% adhesive. Future studies probing the effect of different filler concentrations on various properties of the adhesive are warranted.
Background: There is dearth of studies assessing clinical, restorative, and radiographic peri-implant outcomes around narrow diameter implants (NDIs) and standard diameter implants (SDIs) in obese and nonobese subjects.Objective: To assess clinical, restorative, and radiographic parameters of NDIs and SDIs placed in obese and nonobese individuals. Materials and Methods: Obese and nonobese patients requiring NDIs and SDIs in the anterior maxilla/mandible were included. Based on the implant diameter, participants were further divided into two subgroups: (a) NDIs (3.3 mm) and (b) SDIs (4.1 mm). Peri-implant clinical measurements including plaque index (PI), bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), and radiographic crestal bone loss (CBL) were evaluated around NDIs and SDIs at 1 and 3-year follow-up.Results: A total of 70 patients (35 obese and 35 nonobese) were included. Only BOP showed statistically significant differences between both the groups at patient level at 1 and 3-year follow-up (P < .05). There was no statistically significant difference in PI and PD around NDIs and SDIs between obese and nonobase patients. Statistical significant differences were observed in the total CBL around NDIs and RDIs among obese and nonbase subjects at 3 year follow-up (P < .05).Conclusion: Both NDIs and SDIs show consistent clinical stability among obese and nonobase patients. Higher amount of bone loss was observed in obese patients compared to nonobase patients despite regular hygiene maintenance.
K E Y W O R D Screstal bone loss, narrow implants, obesity, standard-diameter implants
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.