No abstract

Background The joint committee of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine/Japanese Respiratory Society/Japanese Society of Respiratory Care Medicine on ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline has created and released the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021. Methods The 2016 edition of the Clinical Practice Guideline covered clinical questions (CQs) that targeted only adults, but the present guideline includes 15 CQs for children in addition to 46 CQs for adults. As with the previous edition, we used a systematic review method with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system as well as a degree of recommendation determination method. We also conducted systematic reviews that used meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy and network meta-analyses as a new method. Results Recommendations for adult patients with ARDS are described: we suggest against using serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels to identify bacterial pneumonia as the underlying disease (GRADE 2D); we recommend limiting tidal volume to 4–8 mL/kg for mechanical ventilation (GRADE 1D); we recommend against managements targeting an excessively low SpO2 (PaO2) (GRADE 2D); we suggest against using transpulmonary pressure as a routine basis in positive end-expiratory pressure settings (GRADE 2B); we suggest implementing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for those with severe ARDS (GRADE 2B); we suggest against using high-dose steroids (GRADE 2C); and we recommend using low-dose steroids (GRADE 1B). The recommendations for pediatric patients with ARDS are as follows: we suggest against using non-invasive respiratory support (non-invasive positive pressure ventilation/high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy) (GRADE 2D), we suggest placing pediatric patients with moderate ARDS in the prone position (GRADE 2D), we suggest against routinely implementing NO inhalation therapy (GRADE 2C), and we suggest against implementing daily sedation interruption for pediatric patients with respiratory failure (GRADE 2D). Conclusions This article is a translated summary of the full version of the ARDS Clinical Practice Guideline 2021 published in Japanese (URL: https://www.jsicm.org/publication/guideline.html). The original text, which was written for Japanese healthcare professionals, may include different perspectives from healthcare professionals of other countries.

PFIC1, originally described as "Byler disease," is characterized by cholestatic feature and chronic diarrhea. Many patients require LT for the cure, but intractable diarrhea and prolonged growth retardation after LT are serious complications limiting the ultimate outcome of LT for this disease. EBD has recently been shown to be a promising and effective treatment. Recently, we successfully treated a five-yr-old boy with PFIC1 employing EBD after re-transplantation. The patient received LDLT at the age of one yr. Six months after initial transplantation, he developed repeated attacks and diarrhea followed by the development of liver dysfunction and ascites. Liver biopsy at three yr after LDLT revealed the features of chronic graft rejection. With a diagnosis of chronic graft rejection with liver failure, we performed a repeat LDLT with EBD in which the jejunal loop used for hepaticojejunostomy was taken out of the body surface through the abdominal wall. Ten months after surgery, he is doing well, having no attack of diarrhea.

No abstract

Aim: Millions of Japanese people suffer from influenza every year. Many of these patients are treated with neuraminidase inhibitors, particularly with oseltamivir. In traditional Japanese herbal medicine (Kampo medicine), maoto is effective against influenza; it can be administered to children and adolescents, and is much cheaper than oseltamivir or other neuraminidase inhibitors. We estimated the annual savings in medical costs (ASMC) at a national level when oseltamivir was partly replaced with maoto in influenza treatment. Methods: We estimated the following variables: (i) number of influenza patients in a normal (non-pandemic) year in Japan; (ii) number of patients who would be prescribed oseltamivir; (iii) number of patients who could be prescribed maoto instead of oseltamivir; and (iv) medical cost reduction per patient when maoto extract is prescribed instead of oseltamivir. ASMC were calculated by multiplying (iii) and (iv). Results: An approximate estimate of the ASMC was as high as 9 billion yen, given that an estimated 3 million patients were prescribed maoto rather than oseltamivir, with a medical cost reduction of 3000 yen per patient. Conclusion: The direct medical cost reduction with maoto and the magnitude of ASMC were considerably large. Influenza treatment can be more efficient if maoto is introduced into practice.