No abstract
The Mindful Attention Awareness Scale was developed to measure individual differences in the tendency to be mindful. The current study examined the psychometric properties of the Mindful Attention Awareness Scale in a heterogeneous sample of 565 nonmeditators and 612 meditators using the polytomous Rasch model. The results showed that some items did not function the same way for these two groups. Overall, meditators had higher mean estimates than nonmeditators. The analysis identified a group of items as highly discriminating. Using a different model, Van Dam, Earleywine, and Borders in 2010 identified the same group of items as highly discriminating, and concluded that they were the items with the most information. Multiple pieces of evidence from the Rasch analysis showed that these items discriminate highly because of local dependence, hence do not supply independent information. We discussed how these different conclusions, based on similar findings, result from two very different paradigms in measurement.
Andersen (1995, 2002) proves a theorem relating variances of parameter estimates from samples and subsamples and shows its use as an adjunct to standard statistical analyses. The authors show an application where the theorem is central to the hypothesis tested, namely, whether random guessing to multiple choice items affects their estimates in the Rasch model. Taking random guessing to be a function of the difficulty of an item relative to the proficiency of a person, the authors describe a method for creating a subsample of responses, which is least likely to be affected by guessing. Then using Andersen’s theorem, the authors assess the difference in difficulty estimates between responses from the whole sample and the subsample for each item. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the procedure, data are simulated according to a class of models in which random guessing is a function of the proficiency of a person relative to the difficulty of an item. The procedure is also applied to an empirical data set from Raven’s Advanced Progressive Matrices, with the results indicating that guessing is present in a substantial number of items. It is noted that one especially important application in which estimating the correct relative difficulty of items is required is where the items will form part of an item bank and where on subsequent occasions the items will be administered interactively. In this case, items too difficult for a person are not administered and therefore unlikely to attract random guessing.
Models of modern test theory imply statistical independence among responses, generally referred to as local independence. One violation of local independence occurs when the response to one item governs the response to a subsequent item. Expanding on a formulation of this kind of violation as a process in the dichotomous Rasch model, this article generalizes the dependence process to the case of the unidimensional, polytomous Rasch model. It then shows how the magnitude of this violation can be estimated as a change in the location of thresholds separating adjacent categories in the second item caused by the response dependence on the first. As in the dichotomous model, it is suggested that this index is relatively more tangible in interpretation than other indices of dependence that are either a weight in the interaction term in a model or a correlation coefficient. One function of this method of assessing dependence is likely to be in the development of tests and assessment formats where evidence of the magnitude of dependence of one item on another in a pilot study can be used as part of the evidence in deciding which items will be retained in a final version of a test or which formats might need to be reconstructed. A second function might be to identify the magnitude of response dependence that may then need to be taken into account in some other way, perhaps by applying a model that takes account of the dependence.
No abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.