Tourism development on the one hand provides an increase in economic value, on the other hand, it raises environmental problems. Especially in beach tourist destinations. The emergence of many rides, redundant buildings in addition to core buildings such as prayer rooms and toilets, increases environmental problems and reduces comfort. This research aims, firstly, that the need to maintain and preserve the environment is one of human rights and secondly a form of restriction on the development of the development of beach tourist destinations to maintain environmental sustainability and the authenticity of tourist destinations. To answer these problems, this research uses normative legal research methods with a complementary statutory approach, concept approach and case approach. The research results obtained, first, tourism development must maintain environmental sustainability. Because a good living environment is part of human rights as a whole. Protecting and preserving the environment is also an obligation. Second, in the development of tourism, especially in beach tourism destinations, it is very necessary to pay attention to the principles of sustainable tourism development, one of the pillars is environmental preservation. By not carrying out excessive development, maintaining authenticity, to avoid long-term damage. So there needs to be restrictions on development.

Tourism is one of the sources of income that, until now, has become a prima donna. Tourism as a form of the industry has given good advice to the central government, local governments, village governments, the private sector, and the community. In its development, tourist destinations are divided into two forms natural and artificial. Both forms of tourist destinations are located in tourist villages. Tourism development is currently directed at realising tourist villages. Tourist destinations are also equipped with a tourism industry that in it strives to provide all forms of needs needed by tourists, both services and goods. The tourism industry players consist of tourist destination managers and MSME players who sell goods or services. The relationship between tourist destination managers and MSME actors is framed in an agreement made orally based on the principles of trust and needs. This situation tends to cause injustice to MSME actors, who are generally small people. Therefore, solving the problem through a legal breakthrough in regulating business contracts for managing tourist destinations is necessary. The agreement between tourist destination managers and MSME actors is the rule of the game between both parties, which governs rights and obligations. The manufacturing process needs protection from the local government by making regulation yang a reference in managing tourist destinations. Thus, MSME players who are small people are allowed to participate in finding income from the tourism industry in their area by not burdening them.

Regulations related to tourism have existed but are still lacking at the implementation level, especially related to fulfilling tourist rights. The lack of facilities for visitors, especially vulnerable groups, and the lack of protection of a sense of security and comfort in tourist attractions is a problem that needs to be resolved. To increase the number of tourist visits, especially in the regions, one of which is in Bangkalan Regency. For this reason, it is necessary to optimize the role of local governments and increase the fulfilment of tourist rights. This study uses empirical legal research methods supported by statutory and case approaches. It can be concluded from the results of the study, first, that there are regulations related to tourism nationally, and there are also rules at the provincial, regency/ city levels which also contain the rights of tourists. Second, the lack of implementation of the fulfilment of tourist rights is a significant concern, especially by local governments. With its function as the administration of government, local governments not only stop making regulations (become regulators) but also coordinate (coordinators) with related parties, including facilitators, stimulators, and motivators, so that the policy that contains the fulfilment of the rights of tourists is carried out, albeit gradually.

ABSTRAKKeberadaan corona virus di Indonesia membawa perubahan yang sangat besar pada kondisi ekonomi, kesehatan, pendidikan dan lain sebagainya. Berbagai kebijakan di ambil salah satunya adalah pemberian vaksin secara masal dan bertahap. Namun kebijakan ini menimbulkan pro dan kontra dalam masyarakat. Khususnya kebijakan kewajiban vaksin yang dinilai melanggar hak asasi manusia. Karena seharusnya pilihan vaksin adalah sukarela. Ini diperkuat dengan munculnya sanksi bagi yang menolak dilakukan vaksinasi. Kajian ini lakukan untuk mengurai permasalahan apakah kewajiban vaksinasi COVID-19 merupakan bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Untuk menjawab rumusan tersebut digunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang dan konseptual. Dan hasil penelitian ini bahwa kebijakan pemerintah menetapkan kewajiban vaksin tidak bisa lantas di justifikasi sebagai bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia. Karena masyarakat juga memiiki kewajiban sebagai warganegara di bidang kesehatan sebagaimana Pasal 9 ayat 1 UU No. 36 Tahun 2009. Diperkuat Komnas HAM dan sejalan dengan teori yang di sebutkan John Stuart Mill bahwa setiap individu memiliki hak untuk bertindak berdasarkan keinginan mereka selama tindakan mereka tidak merugikan orang lain. Dengan tetap mengupayakan langkah persuasif dengan menimalkan sanksi administratif. Kata Kunci: kebijakan, kewajiban vaksin, pelanggaran HAM  ABSTRACTThe existence of corona virus in Indonesia brings a very large change in economic conditions, health, education and so on. Various policies are taken, one of which is the provision of vaccines en masse and gradually. But this policy raises pros and cons in society. Especially the policy of vaccine obligations that are considered to violate human rights. The vaccine option should be voluntary. This is reinforced by the emergence of sanctions for those who refuse vaccinations. This study was conducted to unravel the problem of whether the COVID-19 vaccination obligation is a form of human rights violations committed by the government. To answer the formulation is used normative research methods with legal and conceptual approaches. And the results of this study that government policies set vaccine obligations can not be then justified as a form of human rights violations. Because the community also has obligations as citizens in the field of health as Article 9 paragraph 1 of Law No. 36 of 2009. Strengthened Komnas HAM and in line with the theory mentioned by John Stuart Mill that every individual has the right to act on their wishes as long as their actions do not harm others. By continuing to pursue persuasive steps by imposing administrative sanctions.Keywords: policies, vaccine obligations, human rights violations

Tourism is an alternative livelihood for people to earn income by utilizing the natural wealth around them. Natural ecosystems need to be conserved so that they remain balanced and can be utilized. These problems are what prompted the emergence of the idea of a green economy. The idea of a green economy aims to encourage the economic development of tourism while still preserving the environmental ecosystem. Therefore, the focus of the problem in this article is to examine the policy direction of green economy ideas in the regulation of tourism in Indonesia. The purpose of this study is to analyze the implementation of the idea of a green economy in the regulation of the tourism sector in Indonesia. Normative research methods are used with statutory and conceptual approaches to analyzing the regulations of the tourism sector in Indonesia. This research resulted in a novelty of draft regulations in the tourism sector that accommodate the idea of a green economy to become a reference for tourism actors to maintain environmental sustainability to realize sustainable tourism and update previous regulations that have not accommodated the idea of a green economy.