No abstract

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), associated with antimicrobial use (AMU), is a major public concern. Surveillance and monitoring systems are essential to assess and control the trends in AMU and AMR. However, differences in the surveillance and monitoring systems between countries and sectors make comparisons challenging. The purpose of this article is to describe all surveillance and monitoring systems for AMU and AMR in the human and livestock sectors, as well as national surveillance and monitoring systems for AMR in food, in six European countries (Spain, Germany, France, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Norway) as a baseline for developing suggestions to overcome current limitations in comparing AMU and AMR data. Methods: A literature search in 2018 was performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles and national and European grey reports as well as AMU/AMR databases. Results: Comparison of AMU and AMR systems across the six countries showed a lack of standardization and harmonization with different AMU data sources (prescription vs sales data) and units of AMU and AMR being used. The AMR data varied by sample type (clinical/non-clinical), laboratory method (disk diffusion, microdilution, and VITEK, among others), data type, ie quantitative (minimum inhibition concentration (MIC) in mg/ L/inhibition zone (IZ) in mm) vs qualitative data (susceptible-intermediate-resistant (SIR)), the standards used (EUCAST/CLSI among others), and/or the evaluation criteria adopted (epidemiological or clinical). Discussion: A One Health approach for AMU and AMR requires harmonization in various aspects between human, animal and food systems at national and international levels. Additionally, some overlap between systems of AMU and AMR has been encountered. Efforts should be made to improve standardization and harmonization and allow more meaningful analyses of AMR and AMU surveillance data under a One Health approach.

Inappropriate hygiene measures in tattoo parlors and non-medical wound care are major risk factors for tattoo-related infections. In addition, facultative pathogenic bacterial species can be isolated from tattoo inks in use, which may pose a serious health risk.

Objectives: Invasive listeriosis is a severe foodborne infection caused by Listeria (L.) monocytogenes. The aim of this investigation was to verify and describe a molecular cluster of listeriosis patients and identify factors leading to this outbreak. Methods: Whole genome sequencing and core genome multilocus sequence typing were used for subtyping L. monocytogenes isolates from listeriosis cases and food samples in Germany. Patient interviews and investigational tracing of foodstuffs offered in health-care facilities (HCF), where some of the cases occurred, were conducted. Results: We identified a German-wide listeriosis outbreak with 39 genetically related cases occurring between 2014 and 2019. Three patients died as a result of listeriosis. After identification of HCF in different regions of Germany for at least 13 cases as places of exposure, investigational tracing of food supplies in six prioritized HCF revealed meat products from one company (X) as a commonality. Subsequently the outbreak strain was analysed in six isolates from ready-to-eat meat products and one isolate from the production environment of company X. No further Sigma1 cases were detected after recall of the meat products from the market and closure of company X (as of August 2020). Conclusions: Interdisciplinary efforts including whole genome sequencing, epidemiological investigations in patients and investigational tracing of foods were essential to identify the source of infections, and thereby prevent further illnesses and deaths. This outbreak underlines the vulnerability of hospitalized patients for foodborne diseases, such as listeriosis. Food producers and HCF should minimize the risk of microbiological hazards when producing, selecting and preparing food for patients.