Though great progress has been realized over the last decade in extending HIV prevention, care and treatment in some of the least resourced settings of the world, a substantial gap remains between what we know works and what we are actually achieving in HIV programs. To address this, leaders have called for the adoption of an implementation science framework to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of HIV programs. Implementation science (IS) is a multidisciplinary scientific field that seeks generalizable knowledge about the magnitude of, determinants of and strategies to close the gap between evidence and routine practice for health in real-world settings. We propose an IS approach that is iterative in nature and composed of four major components: 1) Identifying Bottlenecks and Gaps, 2) Developing and Implementing Strategies, 3) Measuring Effectiveness and Efficiency, and 4) Utilizing Results. With this framework, IS initiatives draw from a variety of disciplines including qualitative and quantitative methodologies in order to develop new approaches responsive to the complexities of real world program delivery. In order to remain useful for the changing programmatic landscape, IS research should factor in relevant timeframes and engage the multi-sectoral community of stakeholders, including community members, health care teams, program managers, researchers and policy makers, to facilitate the development of programs, practices and polices that lead to a more effective and efficient global AIDS response. The approach presented here is a synthesis of approaches and is a useful model to address IS-related questions for HIV prevention, care and treatment programs. This approach, however, is not a panacea, and we will continue to learn new ways of thinking as we move forward to close the implementation gap.

The use of HIV serostatus information has played a pivotal role in partner selection norms. A phenomenon known as serosorting is the practice of selecting a partner based on a perception that they are of the same HIV status in order to avoid transmission from one partner to the other. An understudied aspect of serosorting is that it has a divisive effect—one accepts or rejects a potential partner based on a singular characteristic, the partner's HIV status, and thus excludes all others. This division has been formally referred to as the HIV serodivide. In this study, we explored partner selection strategies among a group of HIV-negative, young men who have sex with men (n = 29) enrolled in a PrEP demonstration project in Northern California. We found that trends in serosorting were in fact shifting, and that a new and opposite phenomenon was emerging, something we labeled “seromixing” and that PrEP use played a part in why norms were changing. We present three orientations in this regard: (1) maintaining the phobia: in which men justified the continued vigilance and exclusion of people living with HIV as viable sex or romantic partners, (2) loosening/relaxation of phobia: among men who were reflecting on their stance on serosorting and its implications for future sexual and/or romantic partnerships, and (3) losing the phobia: among men letting go of serosorting practices and reducing sentiments of HIV-related stigma. The majority of participants spoke of changing or changed attitudes about intentionally accepting rather than rejecting a person living with HIV as a sex partner. For those who maintained strict serosorting practices, their understandings of HIV risk were not erased as a result of PrEP use. These overarching themes help explain how PrEP use is contributing to a closing of the HIV serodivide.

Background: Young men of color who have sex with men face a continual increase in rates of HIV infection. Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an important prevention method for these young men. Setting: The Connecting Resources for Urban Sexual Health (CRUSH) demonstration project provided sexual health services, including PrEP, to young men who have sex with men aged 18–29 years. We report on adherence and factors influencing it. Methods: Participants were offered HIV and sexually transmitted infection testing, prevention counseling, PrEP, and when appropriate, sexually transmitted infection treatment and postexposure prophylaxis. Participants taking PrEP had erythrocyte tenofovir diphosphate and emtricitabine levels measured through dried blood spot testing at 4, 12, and 24 weeks to estimate medication adherence. Participants also completed surveys to assess demographic and psychosocial measures. Results: From February 2014 to November 2015, CRUSH enrolled 257 participants. Ninety-three percent started PrEP, 81% of whom initiated it at their first visit. Twelve percent required postexposure prophylaxis before starting PrEP. Adherence at protective levels was initially high with 87% demonstrating levels consistent with at least 4 doses per week at week 4, compared with 77% at the 48-week follow-up. African American race, exposure to violence, and having survival needs were associated with significantly lower levels of adherence [odds ratio (OR): 0.33; confidence interval (CI): 0.11 to 0.97, P < 0.04; OR: 0.79; CI: 0.59 to 1.04, P < 0.10; OR: 0.51; CI: 0.24 to 1.05, P < 0.07]. Conclusions: Most young men who initiate PrEP adhere at levels that confer protection against HIV infection. Interventions should account for differences in life experiences, particularly addressing the structural challenges facing young African American men.

Although time consuming, development and use of a CBPR covenant can improve high-level engagement and help to accomplish a study's specific aims.

Through forming a collaborative relationship to develop, pilot and evaluate an innovative bio-psycho-behavioral (BPB) HIV prevention intervention, capacity was built in developing an effective intervention and conducting community based research at both the California Prostitutes Prevention and Education Project (CAL-PEP) and the University of California's Family Health Outcomes Project. The research objective was to investigate whether the BPB intervention that included sexually transmitted diseases (STD) testing and behavioral counseling, is superior to standard HIV counseling and testing. This necessitated building capacity at CAL-PEP to deliver clinical services, implement the counseling model, conduct outreach and follow-up, and manage data. University of California, San Francisco, staff needed to build capacity to listen to and incorporate feedback from staff with widely diverse educational and cultural backgrounds. The outcome was to develop the study questionnaire and effective follow-up systems as well as to be able to teach research methods to these staff. Frequent staff meetings to promote trust and mutual respect, incorporating staff and client input into the