No abstract

The purpose of this research is to investigate the influence of Capital Adequacy Ratio, Operating Income Operating Costs, Loan to Deposit Ratio and Bank Size to Non-Performing Loans in Commercial Banks in Indonesia. The sample used in this research consists of 38 commercial banks. The sampling method is non probability sampling with the sampling technique using purposive sampling. The analysis is performed by using the Panel Data regression analysis by the Random Effects Model in testing the hypothesis. The results show that Capital Adequacy Ratio, Operating Income Operating Costs, Loan to Deposit Ratio and Bank Size have a positive effect on Non-Performing Loans (NPL).Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Biaya Operasional Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) dan Ukuran Bank (SIZE) terhadap Non-Performing Loan (NPL) pada Bank Umum Konvensional di Indonesia. Sampel yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari 38 Bank Umum. Metode pengambilan sampel yang digunakan yaitu non probability sampling dengan teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling. Analisis dilakukan dengan menggunakan Analisis Regresi Data Panel dengan Random Effect model dalam pengujian hipotesis. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Capital Adequacy Ratio (CAR), Biaya Operasional Pendapatan Operasional (BOPO), Loan to Deposit Ratio (LDR) dan Ukuran Bank (SIZE) berpengaruh positif terhadap Non-Performing Loan (NPL).

No abstract

<p>The purpose of this study is to prove that there was herding behavior by domestic investors following that of foreign investors in the Indonesian Capital Market (IDX) and that the herding was influenced by information asymmetry. It began when global investors undertook international diversification to the IDX because the returns on their portfolios were not on the efficient frontier during the crisis and because of the low correlation between Indonesia’s economy and the American and European economies. Utilizing the IDX daily transaction data during the years 2009-2011, the herding behavior of domestic investors, which followed that of foreign investors, was tested by Lakonishok models as was the influence of information asymmetry on the herding. It was found that the herding behavior in the IDX occurred in buy, sell or entire herdings (buy and sell). There were 0.40 to 0.55 buy herdings and 0.20 to 0.40 sell herdings during the crisis in 2008 and 2009. Buy herding then continued in 2010 onwards, although with lower intensity (0.05 to 0.20); however, sell herding decreased dramatically, and there has been almost no sell herding since then. Nevertheless, domestic investors did then sell in the opposite strategy, which was to sell when foreign investors tended to buy. Subsequent findings demonstrated that herding occurred with the influence of information asymmetry between domestic and foreign investors. </p>

The purpose of this study is to prove that there was herding behavior by domestic investors following that of foreign investors in the Indonesian Capital Market (IDX) and that the herding was influenced by information asymmetry. It began when global investors undertook international diversification to the IDX because the returns on their portfolios were not on the efficient frontier during the crisis and because of the low correlation between Indonesia’s economy and the American and European economies. Utilizing the IDX daily transaction data during the years 2009-2011, the herding behavior of domestic investors, which followed that of foreign investors, was tested by Lakonishok models as was the influence of information asymmetry on the herding. It was found that the herding behavior in the IDX occurred in buy, sell or entire herdings (buy and sell). There were 0.40 to 0.55 buy herdings and 0.20 to 0.40 sell herdings during the crisis in 2008 and 2009. Buy herding then continued in 2010 onwards, although with lower intensity (0.05 to 0.20); however, sell herding decreased dramatically, and there has been almost no sell herding since then. Nevertheless, domestic investors did then sell in the opposite strategy, which was to sell when foreign investors tended to buy. Subsequent findings demonstrated that herding occurred with the influence of information asymmetry between domestic and foreign investors.