Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the in-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent thrombosis rates along with one-month and one-year survival rates in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) with different methods of stenting, lesion characteristics, and clinical disease presentation. Methods: A total of 297 consecutive patients with unprotected LMCAD were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at University Clinical Center Maribor between January 2008 and October 2016. One hundred and thirty-two (50.8%) eligible patients underwent angiographic follow-up. The majority of patients (86.5%) were treated with a single drug-eluting stent (DES). Results: The overall prevalence of angiographic ISR in unprotected LMCA lesions was 33.3% (44 out of 132 patients with angiographic follow-up). The in-stent restenosis rate was 31.7% (39) in the group initially treated with DES (123). Most patients (63.6%) with ISR underwent repeated PCI, 22.7% had coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and 13.6% were treated conservatively. Only hypertension was shown to be statistically significant as a predictor of ISR in the present study. Stent thrombosis rate was 2.0% (six out of 297 patients). The mortality rate was 12.5% one month after the procedure on the left main coronary artery lesion, and 17.2 % after one year. Conclusion: Patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome had worse outcomes. While the numbers in the present study are higher compared to some other studies, they represent a real-world example of patients with different clinical presentations.

No abstract

In patients with refractory cardiac arrest presumably from acute coronary occlusion, primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) may provide an opportunity for revascularisation and, subsequently, return of spontaneous circulation. We present our experience from a 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention centre serving a population of approximately 800,000 individuals. A retrospective analysis was performed in patients with cardiac arrest treated from July 2011 to January 2014. Inclusion criteria were cardiac arrest and emergency coronary angiography performed during on-going external cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Course of treatment was analysed to outline the reasons for poor survival. Eight patients met the inclusion criteria; six (75 %) were male, and the mean age was 63 ± 16 years. Revascularisation under continuous cardiopulmonary resuscitation was achieved in all eight patients. Sustained return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in two patients (25 %). Both patients had poor neurological outcome (cerebral performance category 4), and both died within 3 months. We identified total duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (90.5 ± 33.3 min), lack of prehospital mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation devices and lack of extra-corporeal life support devices as the most likely reasons contributing to poor survival.