The aim of this clinical study was to describe the possibility of using the Nd:YAG laser device utilized in the dental offices to weld metals intraorally. The authors, before applying this technique “in vivo” on human subjects, tested the “in vitro” metal welding efficacy of dental Nd:YAG device firstly by interferometry, SEM, and EDS and subsequently by thermal camera and thermocouples in order to record temperature changes during the welding process on bovine jaws. Four implants were inserted in the edentulous maxillary arch of a 67 years old male patient. Immediately after that, a bar previously made by the dental technician was intraorally welded to the abutments by Nd:YAG laser (Fidelis Plus III, Fotona, Slovenia) with these parameters: 9.90 mJ, 1 Hz, 15 msec, 0.6 mm spot. Then the prosthesis was connected to the bar with four OT Caps. This clinical study, even if preliminary, suggests that laser welding technique may be intraorally used without side effects.

This preliminary study was undertaken to investigate the effects of Nd:YAG and Ho:YAG lasers on enamel and dentine of extracted teeth. The Ho:YAG laser (spot size 250 microns, energy density 4160 J/cm2) produced a cleaner puncture in dentine with less melting of the surrounding tissue than did the Nd:YAG laser (spot size 20 microns), energy density 50,000 J/cm2), which produced considerable melting and recrystallization of dentine and was more difficult to control. It was possible to cut enamel and dentine with both lasers, but considerable melted and recrystallized enamel was produced. From the limited observations of this study it appears that the Ho:YAG laser is more suitable for cutting both enamel and dentine than the Nd:YAG laser. More work needs to be done to ascertain the effect on enamel and dentine of modification of the parameters of both lasers.

While there are many applications of lasers in dentistry, few have advantages over existing technology. To date, lasers should be considered to be an adjunct to conventional techniques. There are also considerations of cost and rapid obsolescence of current laser equipment. The possible adverse effects of lasers on the tissues adjacent to those being irradiated, to users and to patients must also be considered.

The Nd:YAG laser has been marketed as an instrument for use on both hard and soft dental tissues. Its potential for use on hard tissues is limited but it may be the instrument of choice for use in certain soft tissue procedures. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the Nd:YAG laser on amalgam restorations which frequently occur on tooth surfaces adjacent to areas of soft tissue which may be subjected to the laser. The amalgam used was Tytin. The laser firing was controlled by a computer and a constant repetition rate of 40 Hz was used. Energy per pulse was altered as follows, 30 mJ, 40 mJ. 60 mJ, 80 mJ. 120 mJ and 140 mJ. Exposure times of 0.05 sec (2 pulses). 0. 125 sec (5 pulses), 0.25 sec (10 pulses). 0.5 sec (20 pulses). 1 sec (40 pulses). 2 sec (80 pulses). 3 sec (120 pulses). 4 sec (160 pulses), and 5 sec (200 pulses) were used. The width of defect was measured using a Nikon measurescope with lOx magnification and it was established that the damage threshold lies between 0. 125 sec (5 pulses) and 0.25 sec (10 pulses) for 30 mJ per pulse. The data was analyzed using a one way ANOVA statistical test. There was a significant (p

The Nd:YAG laser has been marketed as an instrument for use on both hard and soft dental tissues. Its potential for use on hard tissues is limited but it may be the instrument of choice for use in certain soft tissue procedures. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of the Nd:YAG laser on amalgam restorations which are frequently placed on tooth surfaces adjacent to areas of soft tissue which may be subjected to the laser. The amalgam used was Tytin. The laser firing was controlled by a computer and a constant repetition rate of 40 Hz was used. Energy per pulse was altered as follows: 30 mJ, 40 mJ, 60 mJ, 80 mJ, 120 mJ and 140 mJ. Exposure times of 0.05 s (2 pulses), 0.125 s (5 pulses), 0.25 s (10 pulses), 0.5 s (20 pulses), 1 s (40 pulses), 2 s (80 pulses), 3 s (120 pulses), 4 s (160 pulses), and 5 s (200 pulses) were used. The width of defect was measured using a measuring microscope with 10ϫ magnification and it was established that the damage threshold lies between 0.125 s (5 pulses) and 0.25 s (10 pulses) for 30 mJ per pulse. Scanning electron microscope observations revealed that the melting of amalgam at exposure times of 5 s actually decreased the size of the observed defect. The data were analysed using a two-way ANOVA statistical test. There was a significant (p<0.001) correlation between the width of the defect and exposure time up to an exposure time of 4 s and the width of d e f e c t and the energy per pulse setting. The findings indicate that amalgam restorations are damaged by inadvertent laser exposure and clinicians must take measures to protect such restorations during lasing of soft tissues.