We developed a bronchial provocation test (BPT) with a dry powder preparation of mannitol. The mannitol was inhaled from gelatin capsules containing 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg to a cumulative dose of 635 mg, and was delivered via an inhalator, Halermatic, or Dinkihaler device. We studied the airway sensitivity to inhaled mannitol, the repeatability of the response, and the recovery after challenge in 43 asthmatic subjects 18 to 39 yr of age who had a 20% decrease in FEV1 in response to inhaling a 4.5% NaCl. We compared this with the airway response to methacholine in 25 subjects. The geometric mean (GM) for the dose of dry mannitol required to reduce the FEV1 by 15% of the baseline value (PD15) was 64 mg, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 45 to 91. Subjects responsive to mannitol had a PD20 to metacholine of < 7.8 mumol, with a GM of 0.7 mumol (CI: 0.4 to 1.2). For the first of two challenges to mannitol the PD15 was 59 mg (CI: 36 to 97) and for the second the PD15 was 58 mg (CI: 35 to 94) p = 0.91 (n = 23). Spontaneous recovery to within 5% of baseline occurred within 60 min and within 10 min after 0.5 mg terbutaline sulfate was inhaled. Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) remained at 93% or above during mannitol challenge. Subjects tolerated the inhalation of the mannitol well. A dry powder preparation of mannitol may be suitable to develop for bronchial provocation testing.
BackgroundThe delivery of antipseudomonal antibiotics by inhalation to Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected subjects with non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis is a logical extension of treatment strategies successfully developed in CF bronchiectasis. Dual release ciprofloxacin for inhalation (DRCFI) contains liposomal ciprofloxacin, formulated to optimise airway antibiotic delivery.MethodsPhase II, 24-week Australian/New Zealand multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 42 adult bronchiectasis subjects with ≥2 pulmonary exacerbations in the prior 12 months and ciprofloxacin-sensitive P aeruginosa at screening. Subjects received DRCFI or placebo in three treatment cycles of 28 days on/28 days off. The primary outcome was change in sputum P aeruginosa bacterial density to the end of treatment cycle 1 (day 28), analysed by modified intention to treat (mITT). Key secondary outcomes included safety and time to first pulmonary exacerbation—after reaching the pulmonary exacerbation endpoint subjects discontinued study drug although remained in the study.ResultsDRCFI resulted in a mean (SD) 4.2 (3.7) log10 CFU/g reduction in P aeruginosa bacterial density at day 28 (vs −0.08 (3.8) with placebo, p=0.002). DRCFI treatment delayed time to first pulmonary exacerbation (median 134 vs 58 days, p=0.057 mITT, p=0.046 per protocol). DRCFI was well tolerated with a similar incidence of systemic adverse events to the placebo group, but fewer pulmonary adverse events.ConclusionsOnce-daily inhaled DRCFI demonstrated potent antipseudomonal microbiological efficacy in adults with non-CF bronchiectasis and ciprofloxacin-sensitive P aeruginosa. In this modest-sized phase II study, DRCFI was also well tolerated and delayed time to first pulmonary exacerbation in the per protocol population.
Hyperosmolarity of the airway surface liquid (ASL) has been proposed as the stimulus for hyperpnoea-induced asthma. We found previously that mucociliary clearance (MCC) was increased after isocapnic hyperventilation (ISH) with dry air, and we proposed that the increase related to transient hyperosmolarity of the ASL. We investigated the effect of increasing the osmolarity of the ASL on MCC, by administering an aerosol of concentrated salt solution.MCC was measured using 99m Tc-sulphur colloid, gamma camera and computer analysis in 12 asthmatic and 10 healthy subjects on three separate days, involving administration of each of the following: 1) ultrasonically nebulized 14.4% saline; 2) ultrasonically nebulized 0.9% saline; and 3) no aerosol intervention (control).The (mean±SD) volume of nebulized 14.4% saline was 2.2±1.2 mL for asthmatics and 3.2±0.7 mL for healthy subjects. This volume was delivered over a period of 5.4±1.3 and 6.4±0.7 min for asthmatic and healthy subjects, respectively. The airway response to 14.4% saline was assessed on a separate visit and the fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 22±4% in the asthmatic and 3±2% in the healthy subjects. Compared to the MCC with the 0.9% saline and control, the hypertonic aerosol increased MCC in both groups. In asthmatic subjects, MCC of the whole right lung in 1 h was 68±10% with 14.4% saline vs 44±14% with 0.9% saline and 39±13% with control. In healthy subjects, MCC of the whole right lung in 1 h was 53±12% with 14.4% saline vs 41±15% with 0.9% saline and 36±13% with control.We conclude that an increase in osmolarity of the airway surface liquid increases mucociliary clearance both in asthmatic and healthy subjects. These findings are in keeping with our previous suggestion that the increase in mucociliary clearance after isotonic hyperventilation with dry air is due to a transient hyperosmolarity of the airway surface liquid. Eur Respir J., 1996, 9, 725- We have previously found that mucociliary clearance (MCC) increases immediately after hyperventilation with dry air both in asthmatic and healthy subjects [1] at the time that asthmatic subjects develop airway narrowing. Although the mechanism for this increase is unknown, we postulated that the increase in MCC after hyperventilation with dry air is due to a transient hyperosmolarity of the airway surface liquid [1]. It is possible that the increase in MCC and the bronchoconstriction that follows hyperventilation with dry air share a common mechanism.Inhalation of hypertonic saline aerosol (7%) has been shown to increase mucociliary clearance in patients with bronchitis [2] and cystic fibrosis [3] who have impaired baseline mucociliary clearance. Although, these studies suggest that hypertonic saline stimulates the mucociliary system, there are no reported studies of the effect of hypertonic saline on the MCC in asthmatic and healthy subjects with normal baseline mucociliary clearance.The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of a hyperosmolar stimulus on MC...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.