Everyone has paid much attention to modulation-type recognition in the past few years. There are many ways to find the modulation type, but only a few good ways to deal with signals with a lot of noise. This study comes up with a way to test how well different machine learning algorithms can handle noise when detecting digital and analogue modulations. This study looks at the four most common digital and analogue modulations: Phase Shift Keying, Quadrature Phase Shift Keying, Amplitude Modulation, and Morse Code. A signal noise rate from -10dB to +25dB is used to find these modulations. We used machine learning algorithms to determine the modulation type like Decision Tree, Random Forest, Support Vectors Machine, and k-nearest neighbours. After the IQ samples had been converted to the amplitude of samples and radio frequency format, the accuracy of each method looked good. Still, in the format of the sample phase, each algorithm's accuracy was less. The results show that the proposed method works to find the signals that have noises. When there is less noise, the random forest algorithm gives better results than SVM, but SVM gives better results when there is more noise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.