PURPOSE: This study examined whether the use of trekking poles alters metabolic cost in steep hiking by novice hikers and whether the response would be dependent on the grade of the terrain. METHODS: Twelve participants completed two trekking trials (with poles [WP] and without trekking poles [NP]) with round trips comprising three grades: 7.0 ± 0.7°, 12.9 ± 0.7°, and 18.8 ± 1.3°) over a steep mountain at self-paced speeds. During the trials, time spent for trekking (TT), oxygen consumption (VO 2 ), heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and step frequency (Sf) were measured, and step efficiency (Se) and oxygen pulse (OP) were calculated. RESULTS: TT tended to be longer in the WP than NP for both terrains (P < 0.05). HR, VO 2 , and RPE were the same for the WP and NP. Sf was lower in WP going uphill (P < 0.05) but was unchanged going downhill. Se in the WP was higher than in the NP for both terrains (P < 0.01). When analyzed by slope, VO 2 during uphill at 18.8° was lower in WP (37.2 ± 6.3) than in NP (38.6 ± 7.1 ml·kg −1 ·min −1 , P < 0.05), but no difference in VO 2 was found between WP and NP at the 12.9° and 7.0°. TT during uphill was slower in WP than NP at 12.9° (7.9 ± 1.1 vs. 7.4 ± 1.0) and 18.8° (5.3 ± 1.3 vs. 4.9 ± 1.0 min, respectively, P < 0.05). No differences were noticed in HR and OP during uphill at every grade. CONCLUSIONS: Pole use decreased metabolic cost in the novice hikers only in the highest grade but not in the other two lower grades.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.