BACKGROUND: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a reliable and cost-effective diagnostic tool for establishing the nature of thyroid nodules, although up to 30% of FNAs are still classified as "indeterminate." Molecular testing of FNAs could improve preoperative diagnosis, thereby reducing unnecessary surgery. In this multicenter prospective study the authors investigated, using a 7-gene assay, the distribution and diagnostic impact of BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/ PPARg, the most frequent genomic alterations occurring during thyroid oncogenesis. METHODS: In total, of 1172 routine FNAs from 7 centers in southern Italy were classified according to the Bethesda System for Reporting ThyroidCytopathology. Each specimen was tested, and molecular data were compared with available histology or cytologic follow-up. RESULTS: In particular, for atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cases, the 7-gene test confirmed the high positive predictive value of BRAFV600E and BRAF-like mutations (80%) and the moderate positive predictive value of RAS-like alterations (32.4%), suggesting different surgical management, depending on the type of mutation. The rate of mutation-positive FNAs was strictly related to the risk of malignancy of each diagnostic class, supporting the identification of prognostically relevant diagnostic categories. CONCLUSIONS:The 7-gene panel test improves the preoperative risk stratification of indeterminate thyroid FNAs, especially when considering the biologic significance of the different types of mutations. Moreover, the rate of mutation-positive FNAs is related to the risk of malignancy of each diagnostic class.
IntroductionLung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer death, worldwide (1). In the last years, several clinical trials have defined the pivotal role of the molecular assessment of different biomarkers, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS proto-oncogene 1 receptor tyrosine kinase (ROS1), v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), in order to administrate either tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or immune-checkpoint inhibitors to improve survival and quality of life of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (2-14).
Background: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) (US-guided FNAB) is a rapid and cost-effective procedure for the diagnosis of breast lesions. Our Institution has a long tradition in breast FNAB performed by cytopathologists; recently we adopted both US guidance and a five-tiered classification system similar to that proposed by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC). The aim of this study was to demonstrate the continuing role of US-guided FNAB in the diagnosis of breast lesions, despite the growing adoption of core-needle biopsy (CNB). Methods: The laboratory information database system was searched to obtain the breast FNAB diagnostic reports recorded from 2010 to 2017 and classified using a five-tiered Classification System; each entry was matched with the available histology. Results: A total of 4624 breast FNAB samples were retrieved. Of these, 1745/4624 cases (37.7%) had histological follow-ups. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was 4.9% for benign, 20.7% for atypical, 78.7% for suspicious of malignancy, and 98.8% for malignant. When the atypical category was evaluated as a negative index, the positive predictive value was 93.73%, and the negative predictive value was 90.78%, reaching an overall diagnostic accuracy of 92.82%. Conclusions: The IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast FNAB Cytopathology clearly identifies different diagnostic categories with increasing ROM. Most of the FNAB samples were classified as benign or malignant (65.3%), warranting prompt management for these patients. Moreover, the inclusion of the atypical category as a low-risk indeterminate category avoided overtreatment of benign lesions. Thus, despite the well-established merits of CNB, US-guided FNAB still represents a costeffective and rapid nonoperative diagnostic approach.
Purpose
Nowadays, the clinical management of thyroid nodules needs to be multi-disciplinary. In particular, the crosstalk between endocrinologists and cytopathologists is key. When FNAs are properly requested by endocrinologists for nodules characterised by relevant clinical and ultrasound features, cytopathologists play a pivotal role in the diagnostic work-up. Conversely, improper FNA requests can lead to questionable diagnostic efficiency. Recently, recommendations to delay all non-urgent diagnostic procedures, such as thyroid FNAs, to contain the spread of COVID-19 infection, have made the interplay between endocrinologists and cytopathologists even more essential. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our practice by evaluating the total number of FNAs performed and the distribution of the Bethesda Categories before, during, and after the lockdown.
Methods
We analysed the FNA trends before (1st January 2019 to March 13th 2020), during (March 14th to May 15th), and after (May 16th to July 7th) the lockdown.
Results
Although the total number of weekly FNAs dropped from 62.1 to 23.1, our referring endocrinologists managed to prioritise patients with high-risk nodules. In fact, in the post-lockdown, the weekly proportion of benign diagnoses dropped on average by 12% and that of high-risk diagnoses increased by 6%.
Conclusions
The lesson we have learned so far from this pandemic is that by applying safety protocols to avoid contagion and by increasing the threshold for FNA requests for thyroid nodules, we can continue to guarantee our services to high-risk patients even in times of a health crisis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.