The tight control of transcriptional coactivators is a fundamental aspect of gene expression in cells. The regulation of the CREB-binding protein (CBP) and p300 coactivators, two paralog multidomain proteins, involves an autoinhibitory loop (AIL) of the histone acetyltransferase (HAT) domain. There is experimental evidence for the AIL engaging with the HAT binding site, thus interrupting the acetylation of histone tails or other proteins. Both CBP and p300 contain a domain of about 110 residues (called the bromodomain) that recognizes histone tails with one or more acetylated lysine side chains. Here, we investigate by molecular dynamics simulations whether the AIL of CBP (residues 1556–1618) acetylated at the side chain of Lys1595 can bind to the bromodomain. The structural instability and fast unbinding kinetics of the AIL from the bromodomain pocket suggest that the AIL is not a ligand of the bromodomain on the same protein chain. This is further supported by the absence of strong and persistent contacts at the binding interface. Furthermore, the simulations of unbinding show an initial fast detachment of the acetylated lysine and a slower phase necessary for complete AIL dissociation. We provide further evidence for the instability of the AIL intramolecular binding by comparison with a natural ligand, the histone peptide H3K56ac, which shows higher stability in the pocket.

T‐cell receptor (TCR) recognition of the myelin basic protein (MBP) peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein HLA‐DR2a, one of the MHC class II alleles associated with multiple sclerosis, is highly variable. Interactions in the trimolecular complex between the TCR of the MBP83‐99‐specific T cell clone 3A6 with the MBP‐peptide/HLA‐DR2a (abbreviated TCR/pMHC) lead to substantially different proliferative responses when comparing the wild‐type decapeptide MBP90‐99 and a superagonist peptide, which differs mainly in the residues that point toward the TCR. Here, we investigate the influence of the peptide sequence on the interface and intrinsic plasticity of the TCR/pMHC trimolecular and pMHC bimolecular complexes by molecular dynamics simulations. The intermolecular contacts at the TCR/pMHC interface are similar for the complexes with the superagonist and the MBP self‐peptide. The orientation angle between TCR and pMHC fluctuates less in the complex with the superagonist peptide. Thus, the higher structural stability of the TCR/pMHC tripartite complex with the superagonist peptide, rather than a major difference in binding mode with respect to the self‐peptide, seems to be responsible for the stronger proliferative response.

T-cell receptor (TCR) recognition of myelin basic protein (MBP) peptide presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein HLA-DR2a, one of the MHC class II alleles associated with multiple sclerosis, is highly variable. Interactions in the trimolecular complex between the TCR of MBP83-99-specific T cell clone 3A6 with the MBP-peptide/HLA-DR2a (abbreviated TCR/pMHC) lead to substantially different proliferative responses when comparing the wild-type decapeptide MBP90-99 and a superagonist peptide which differs mainly in the residues that point towards the TCR. Here we investigate the influence of the peptide sequence on the interface and intrinsic plasticity of the TCR/pMHC trimolecular and pMHC bimolecular complexes by molecular dynamics simulations. The intermolecular contacts at the TCR/pMHC interface are similar for the complexes with the superagonist and the MBP self-peptide. The orientation angle between TCR and pMHC fluctuates less in the complex with the superagonist peptide. Thus, the higher structural stability of the TCR/pMHC tripartite complex with the superagonist peptide, rather than a major difference in binding mode with respect to the self-peptide, seems to be responsible for the stronger proliferative response.