Impressive therapeutic advances have been possible through the advent of zinc-finger nucleases and transcription activator-like effector nucleases. However, discovery of the more efficient and highly tailorable clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and associated proteins (Cas9) has provided unprecedented gene-editing capabilities for treatment of various inherited and acquired diseases. Despite recent clinical trials, a major barrier for therapeutic gene editing is the absence of safe and effective methods for local and systemic delivery of gene-editing reagents. In this review, we elaborate on the challenges and provide practical considerations for improving gene editing. Specifically, we highlight issues associated with delivery of gene-editing tools into clinically relevant cells.
Adeno-associated virus vectors are the most used delivery method for liver-directed gene editing. Still, they are associated with significant disadvantages that can compromise the safety and efficacy of therapies. Here, we investigate the effects of electroporating CRISPR-Cas9 as mRNA and ribonucleoproteins (RNPs) into primary hepatocytes regarding on-target activity, specificity, and cell viability. We observed a transfection efficiency of >60% and on-target insertions/deletions (indels) of up to 95% in primary mouse hepatocytes electroporated with Cas9 RNPs targeting
Hpd
, the gene encoding hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. In primary human hepatocytes, we observed on-target indels of 52.4% with Cas9 RNPs and >65% viability after electroporation. These results establish the impact of using electroporation to deliver Cas9 RNPs into primary hepatocytes as a highly efficient and potentially safe approach for therapeutic liver-directed gene editing and the production of liver disease models.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.