No abstract

Iron species can act as electron donors, electron acceptors or serve as a sorbent to co-precipitate contaminants. These properties, along with its relatively low cost as a material, make iron an ideal compound for environmental applications in the removal of pollutants from water and wastewater. This study assesses the use of metallic iron as a reductant for the removal of toxic Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions, as well as the use of hexavalent iron (ferrates) for the removal of organic compounds, turbidity and biological contaminants from water and wastewater. Laboratory-scale experiments show that the Cr(VI) removal efficiency of metallic iron filling materials, such as scrap iron fillings, via reduction to Cr(III) and the subsequent precipitation/filtration of aggregates can reach values over 99.0%. Moreover, the efficiency of ferrates, in situ synthesized via a low-cost Fe0/Fe0 electrochemical cell, in the removal of organic compounds, turbidity and biological contaminants from high-strength industrial wastewater, biologically treated wastewater and natural water can also reach values over 99.0%. The results showed that iron species can be applied in low-cost and environmentally friendly technologies for natural water remediation and wastewater treatment. Furthermore, the study showed that the challenge of an iron material’s surface passivation, as well as of ferrates’ procurement cost and stability, can be resolved via the application of ultrasounds and via in situ ferrate electrosynthesis.

Biological wastewater treatment is linked to direct and indirect greenhouse gases (GHGs) emissions, thus new approaches on design and operation of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) must be adopted aiming towards GHGs emissions’ mitigation. This study evaluates the impact of solids retention time (SRT) on GHGs (CO2 and N2O) emissions of activated sludge (AS) wastewater treatment processes with nutrients removal operating at 10, 30 and 180 days SRT. The 180 days SRT represents the complete solids retention AS process (CRAS), which introduces a novel WWTP design and operation approach for excess sludge reduction. The evaluation of GHGs emissions and process performance via ASDM model and Bridle methodology showed that the total N2O emissions increased together with increasing dissolved oxygen and SRT. CRAS process achieved 97,4% and 96,2% excess sludge reduction compared to AS process with SRT of 10 d and 30 d respectively, with total direct emissions in CRAS process being respectively higher by 20,0% and 12,2%. The lower total indirect emissions in CRAS process compensate for the higher direct emissions. At high influent loads, the balance in GHGs emissions tilts in favour of CRAS process due to management of increased excess sludge quantities, rendering CRAS process a more sustainable choice.