A quick-hardening track (QHT) was developed by injecting quick-hardening mortar into an existing ballast track to rapidly substitute the ballast track with a slab track, thereby improving maintainability and running safety. QHT tracks on a bridge undergo track–bridge interactions similar to other track systems. This paper presents a model to analyze the interaction between the QHT and the bridge. This model considers the longitudinal resistances of rail fasteners and anchors, as well as the interlayer friction between the track and the bridge. A sequential analysis method was applied to systematically consider such effects, revealing that rail additional stress will be high if the track slips over the bridge for a very low frictional coefficient of 0.1. Furthermore, a track segment without an anchor can slip under train traction load when the frictional coefficient is 0.3 or lower. For low friction cases, low-speed operation is advised to prevent the accumulation of the resulting longitudinal slip displacements of the track. An anchor should be installed immediately after the quick-hardening mortar provides sufficient bearing strength to the anchors. The proposed sequential analysis is useful for determining the critical friction coefficient and appropriate longitudinal resistance of a rail fastener, as well as for verifying track safety.

A quick-hardening concrete track has been developed to convert old ballast tracks into concrete tracks on operating lines. This method has been utilized to convert urban railways since 1997. With recent increases in train traffic and speed, maintaining track irregularities within design criteria has become essential to ensuring safety. On quick-hardening tracks, track irregularities are predominantly caused by irregular settlement around construction joints. These construction joints are inevitable in quick-hardening concrete; however, they create discontinuous sections that can affect the stable running of trains and structural durability. In this study, full-scale tests were performed with quasi-static and repeated loading on both continuous and discontinuous sections in which the earth pressure acting on the trackbed, accumulated settlement, and elastic displacement were measured. The results obtained indicate that construction joints are disadvantageous in terms of load transfer, settlement, and displacement. Additional field observations conducted on the Seoul Metro Line corroborated the results of the full-scale tests. The overall findings strongly suggest that construction joints on quick-hardening concrete tracks would need to be reinforced.

No abstract

Groundwater drawdown was pointed out as one of the causes of induced settlement on high speed railways, especially concrete track. In this study, the effect of groundwater variation on settlement was evaluated through a comparison of field measurements with numerical analysis results. A trial and error method, i.e., repeated numerical analyses by changing material properties, was used to calibrate the model. The model was applied to investigate the effect of groundwater drawdown, thickness of soft layer, and embankment height on residual settlement after concrete track completion. A soft layer thicker than 4m would result in more than 30mm of settlement; a detailed analysis of groundwater behavior thus should be conducted from the design stage to construction.