The CC chemokine receptor-1 (CCR1) is a prime therapeutic target for treating autoimmune diseases. Through high capacity screening followed by chemical optimization, we identified a novel non-peptide CCR1 antagonist, R-N-[5-chloro-2-[2-[4-[(4-fluorophenyl)methyl]-2-methyl-1-piperazinyl]-2-oxoethoxy]phenyl]urea hydrochloric acid salt (BX 471). Competition binding studies revealed that BX 471 was able to displace the CCR1 ligands macrophage inflammatory protein-1␣ (MIP-1␣), RANTES, and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 (MCP-3) with high affinity (K i ranged from 1 nM to 5.5 nM). BX 471 was a potent functional antagonist based on its ability to inhibit a number of CCR1-mediated effects including Ca 2؉ mobilization, increase in extracellular acidification rate, CD11b expression, and leukocyte migration. BX 471 demonstrated a greater than 10,000-fold selectivity for CCR1 compared with 28 G-protein-coupled receptors. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that BX 471 was orally active with a bioavailability of 60% in dogs. Furthermore, BX 471 effectively reduces disease in a rat experimental allergic encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. This study is the first to demonstrate that a non-peptide chemokine receptor antagonist is efficacious in an animal model of an autoimmune disease. In summary, we have identified a potent, selective, and orally available CCR1 antagonist that may be useful in the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases.It is clear that the inappropriate interaction of immune cells, such as T lymphocytes and monocytes, can lead to extensive inflammation and tissue destruction, which is a hallmark of several autoimmune diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Immune cells are sent on their destructive journey by chemoattractant molecules known as chemokines, which interact with and signal through specific cell surface chemokine receptors. Chemokine receptors belong to the GPCR 1 superfamily and have been viewed as attractive therapeutic targets by the pharmaceutical industry mainly because of their central role in regulating leukocyte trafficking. The premise that drugs that can inhibit the directed migration and activation of immune cells could be useful therapeutically has prompted the search for specific and highly potent chemokine receptor antagonists.Autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis are characterized by interactions between invading T lymphocytes and tissue macrophages that result in extensive inflammation, tissue damage, and chronic disease pathologies. Numerous studies have demonstrated CCR1 expression in these cell types, and a variety of evidence provides strong in vivo concept validation for a role of this receptor in animal models of these diseases. For example, Karpus et al. (1, 2) were able to show in a mouse EAE model of multiple sclerosis that antibodies to MIP-1␣ prevented the development of both initial and relapsing paralytic disease as well as infiltration of mononuclear cells into the central nervous system. Treatment wit...

The CC chemokines macrophage inflammatory protein-1␣ (MIP-1␣) and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed) have been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis. Since their effects are mediated through the CCR1 chemokine receptor, we set up a small molecule CCR1 antagonist program to search for inhibitors. Through high capacity screening we discovered a number of 4-hydroxypiperidine compounds with CCR1 antagonist activity and report their synthesis and in vitro pharmacology here. Scatchard analysis of the competition binding data revealed that the compounds had K i values ranging from 40 to 4000 nM. The pharmacological profile of the most potent member of this series, compound 1 (2-2-diphenyl-5-(4-chlorophenyl)piperidin-lyl)valeronitrite), was further evaluated. The directed migration of select populations of leukocytes from the circulation to sites of inflammation is an integral part of the immune response. The chemokines are a diverse group of proteins that play an important role in this process (1). They are classified into two major groups, CXC and CC, based on the position of the first two of their four invariant cysteines (2). Each of the chemokines recognizes and induces the chemotaxis of a particular subset of leukocytes. For example, the CXC chemokines, like IL-8 1 and melonoma growth stimulatory activity, mainly chemoattract and activate neutrophils, in contrast to the CC chemokines, like RANTES and monocyte chemoattractant protein, which preferentially attract T lymphocytes and monocytes and induce their activation by producing changes in cellular morphology, transient increases in cellular calcium concentration, and the up-regulation of surface adhesion proteins.The chemokines produce their biologic effects by interacting with specific receptors on the cell surface of their target cells (3). To date, 14 different chemokine receptors including eight CC chemokine receptors have been identified by cloning (4, 5). All of these receptors are characterized by a heptahelical structure and belong to a superfamily of serpentine receptors that are coupled to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G-proteins) (6).Occasionally the immune system can turn upon its host, giving rise to chronic inflammation and disease. Given their important role in this process, chemokines have been implicated in the pathophysiology of autoimmune diseases like multiple sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis. For example a recent study by Karpus et al. (7) provides strong in vivo concept validation for a role of MIP-1␣ in a mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) model of multiple sclerosis. These investigators were able to show that antibodies to MIP-1␣ prevented the development of both acute and relapsing paralytic disease as well as infiltration of mononuclear cells into the central nervous system. Treatment with MIP-1␣ antibody was also able to ameliorate the severity of ongoing clinical disease. These results led the authors to conclude that MIP-1␣ plays an important role in this T-cell me...

Chemokines like RANTES appear to play a role in organ transplant rejection. Because RANTES is a potent agonist for the chemokine receptor CCR1, we examined whether the CCR1 receptor antagonist BX471 is efficacious in a rat heterotopic heart transplant rejection model. Treatment of animals with BX471 and a subtherapeutic dose of cyclosporin (2.5 mg/kg), which is by itself ineffective in prolonging transplant rejection, is much more efficacious in prolonging transplantation rejection than animals treated with either cyclosporin or BX471 alone. We have examined the mechanism of action of the CCR1 antagonist in in vitro flow assays over microvascular endothelium and have discovered that the antagonist blocks the firm adhesion of monocytes triggered by RANTES on inflamed endothelium. Together, these data demonstrate a significant role for CCR1 in allograft rejection.The classic signs of acute cellular rejection during organ transplantation include the infiltration of mononuclear cells into the interstitium (1). This cellular infiltrate consists mainly of T lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages that are recruited from the circulation into the transplanted tissue by chemotactic molecules known as chemokines. Chemokines belong to a large family of small (8 -10 kDa) inducible chemotactic cytokines, which are characterized by a distinctive pattern of four conserved cysteine residues (2). Currently over 40 chemokines have been identified and classified into two major groups, CXC and CC, dependent on the number and spacing of the first two conserved cysteine residues. The CXC class members include interleukin (IL-8), 1 melanoma growth stimulatory activity, and neutrophil-activating peptide-2, whereas the CC class includes RANTES, monocyte chemotactic protein-1, and MIP-1␣ (macrophage inflammatory protein-1).A number of studies have provided evidence for a role for RANTES in organ transplant rejection, particularly of the kidney. In a model of reperfusion injury in the rat, RANTES levels were increased over normal levels and remained high for more than a week, correlating with the peak of infiltrating macrophages (3). RANTES protein was detected in infiltrating mononuclear cells, tubular epithelium, and vascular endothelium of renal allograft biopsy specimens from patients with cyclosporin nephrotoxicity but not in normal kidney (1). A recent study suggests that RANTES may play a role in graft atherosclerosis (4). Increased levels of RANTES (both mRNA and protein) were detected in mononuclear cells, myofibroblasts, and endothelial cells of arteries undergoing accelerated atherosclerosis compared with normal coronary arteries. In another recent renal transplant study, the chemokine receptor antagonist Met-RANTES when given with low doses of cyclosporin significantly reduced renal injury including interstitial inflammation mainly by reducing the number of infiltrating monocytes (5).Mechanistically this appeared to be achieved by blocking the firm adhesion of these cells to the inflamed endothelium. In summary, these studies ...

The influence of the 3-substituent on the cytotoxicity of the 6-aziridinylpyrrolo[1,2-a]-benzimidazole quinones (PBIs), the 6-acetamidopyrrolo[1,2-alpha]benzimidazole quinones (APBIs), and the 6-acetamidopyrrolo[1,2-alpha]benzimidazole iminoquinones (imino-APBIs) was investigated by comparing LC50 mean graphs consisting of 60 cancer lines. Increasing lipophilicity of the 3-substituent of PBIs and APBIs increased the cytotoxicity specifically in melanoma cell lines. The 3-substituent does not influence DNA cleavage by reduced PBIs, except for the 3-carbamate derivative which shows enhanced cleavage. This property of the 3-carbamate is rationalized in terms of the PBI major groove binding model. The imino-APBIs show enhanced cytotoxicity in melanoma and renal cancer cell lines; the correlation coefficient for log LC50 vs log lipophilicity is 0.8 to 0.9. COMPARE correlations revealed that the PBIs are activated by DT-diaphorase but that the APBIs and imino-APBIs are inactivated by this enzyme. Thus, the latter two agents are cytotoxic only as quinones. It was noted that APBIs possess a similar cytotoxic profile to three anthracycline analogues. This observation suggests mechanistic similarities between both types of cytotoxic agents. Major conclusions of this study pertain to the design of agents displaying cytotoxicity specifically against melanoma and renal cancers and to the use of 60-cell line mean graphs and COMPARE in cancer drug QSAR.

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily and mediate several physiological responses, such as blood pressure, food intake, sedation and memory retention. To understand the interactions between the NPY Y1 receptor subtype and its ligands, computer modeling was applied to the natural peptide agonist, NPY and a small molecule antagonist, BIBP3226. An agonist and antagonist binding domain was elucidated using mutagenesis data for the Y1 receptor as well as for other GPCR families. The agonist and antagonist ligands which were investigated appear to share common residues for their interaction within the transmembrane regions of the Y1 receptor structure, including Gln120, Asn283 and His306. This is in contrast to findings with tachykinin receptors where the binding domains of the non-peptide antagonists have very little in common with the binding domains of the agonist, substance-P. In addition, a hydrogen bond between the hydroxyl group of Tyr36 of NPY and the side chain of Gln219, an interaction that is absent in the model complex between Y1 and the antagonist BIBP3226, is proposed as one of the potential interactions necessary for receptor activation.