Introduction
C4d, an early product in the classical/lectin complement pathway has shown potential in the evaluation of C3 glomerulopathy where its absence would support an alternative pathway abnormality. As autoimmune/genetic complement testing is not readily available to most parts of the world, glomerular C4d staining may serve as a useful additional step toward the diagnosis.
Methods
To test this hypothesis, C4d staining was performed on a large cohort of C3 glomerulopathy. Archival cases from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed and immunohistochemistry for C4d was performed, scored (scale of 0 to 3+), and correlated with the immunofluorescence and ultrastructural findings. Paraffin immunofluorescence was performed in cases of “discordant C4d” to unmask Igs.
Results
Twenty-seven cases of dense deposit disease (DDD) and 14 cases of C3 glomerulonephritis (C3GN) were retrieved. C4d demonstrated a range of staining intensities with negative/traces in only 22% of DDD and 64% of C3GN. Lower-intensity C4d staining (1 to 2+) was mostly concordant with similar amounts of Igs/C1q. Discordant 3+ staining was noted in approximately 50% of cases of DDD and 20% of cases of C3GN. Among them, paraffin immunofluorescence unmasked polyclonal Igs in 2 of 5 cases of DDD and 1 of 3 cases of C3GN.
Conclusion
This observational study suggests that the presence of glomerular C4d should not exclude a C3 glomerulopathy. In lower intensities, it appears to represent overlying classical/lectin pathway activation with concordant Ig/C1q deposits. A subset of cases, however, displays intense and discordant C4d staining, which raises the possibility of an associated lectin pathway abnormality, a potential future area of study.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.