The gig economy, which is also referred to as the sharing or on-demand economy, involves the use of online platforms to offer and find short-term work, goods, and services on a flexible basis. These platforms, which allow freelancers and independent contractors to connect with clients in need of their services, have gained widespread popularity in recent years. However, the gig economy has been the subject of much controversy, particularly regarding the fairness of platform rating systems and their impact on workers' income and job security. This article presents an analysis of the distribution of fairness and perceived satisfaction with ranking systems in these work markets, and discusses the ways in which these systems may lead to unfair outcomes for workers. It also examines the effects of these systems on workers' income and job security, and investigates the potential influence of factors such as gender, age, and employment status on the fairness of these rating systems. The article suggests directions for further research on this topic and considers the implications of these findings for policymakers and practitioners.