ObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial perfusion at 1.5- and 3-tesla (T) for detecting significant coronary artery disease (CAD), with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) as the reference method.Materials and MethodsWe prospectively enrolled 281 patients (age 62.4 ± 8.3 years, 193 men) with suspected or known CAD who had undergone 1.5T or 3T CMR and ICA. Two independent radiologists interpreted perfusion defects. With ICA as the reference standard, the diagnostic performance of 1.5T and 3T CMR for identifying significant CAD (≥ 50% diameter reduction of the left main and ≥ 70% diameter reduction of other epicardial arteries) was determined.ResultsNo differences were observed in baseline characteristics or prevalence of CAD and old myocardial infarction (MI) using 1.5T (n = 135) or 3T (n = 146) systems. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for detecting significant CAD were similar between the 1.5T (84%, 64%, 74%, 76%, and 0.75 per patient and 68%, 83%, 66%, 84%, and 0.76 per vessel) and 3T (80%, 71%, 71%, 80%, and 0.76 per patient and 75%, 86%, 64%, 91%, and 0.81 per vessel) systems. In patients with multi-vessel CAD without old MI, the sensitivity, specificity, and AUC with 3T were greater than those with 1.5T on a per-vessel basis (71% vs. 36%, 92% vs. 69%, and 0.82 vs. 0.53, respectively).Conclusion3T CMR has similar diagnostic performance to 1.5T CMR in detecting significant CAD, except for higher diagnostic performance in patients with multi-vessel CAD without old MI.

Objective:We determined the diagnostic performance of stress dual-energy computed tomography-myocardial perfusion imaging (DECT-MPI) for diagnosing coronary artery stenoses causing ischemia. Materials and Methods:Institutional review board approval and informed patient consent were obtained before patient enrollment in the study. One hundred ninety-two consecutive patients (135 males, 63.1±8.0 years) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress DECT-MPI, and a combined invasive coronary angiography (ICA)/cardiac magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging (CMR-MPI) for further comparison. Stress DECT-MPI and CMR-MPI were evaluated for perfusion deficits, whereas CCTA and ICA were evaluated for coronary stenosis ≥50%. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance of combined CCTA/stress DECT-MPI compared with combined ICA/CMR-MPI at the per-vessel level. Individual direct comparisons of CCTA to ICA and stress DECT-MPI to CMR-MPI were explored. Results:One hundred forty-four (75%) patients and 257 (45%) vascular territories manifested ischemia-causing coronary stenoses based on combined ICA/CMR-MPI. Per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of combined CCTA/stress DECT-MPI were 88, 82, 79, and 89%, respectively, compared with combined ICA/ CMR-MPI. The values for CCTA alone were 95, 45, 63, and 94%, respectively, and the values for stress DECT-MPI alone were 91, 75, 75, and 92%, respectively. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for combined CCTA/stress DECT-MPI was higher than that for CCTA alone (0.85 vs. 0.75, p=0.001). Conclusion:When compared with combined ICA/CMR-MPI, combined CCTA/stress DECT-MPI improved the predictive value for coronary stenoses causing ischemia compared with CCTA, but only mildly improved the diagnostic performance of stress DECT-MPI alone.