Background: The current gold standard for donor heart preservation is a three-bag-technique and storage in a cooler filled with slush ice. This technique can cause freezing injury with protein denaturation. We report our early experience with a single-use disposable device (SherpaPak™, Paragonix Technologies, MA, USA) specifically designed for sterile permanent temperature-controlled transportation of donor hearts. Methods: In this case control study with 2:1 matching we identified 21 patients after heart transplantation depending on type of organ transport (standard three-bag-technique vs. SherpaPak™). The outcome after donor heart storage in the SherpaPak™ was compared with donor heart transportation with the standard technique. Results: Since July 2018 seven patients (5 males; mean age 50.3±13.2years) underwent heart transplantation with the SherpaPak™ system. Cold ischemic time was longer in the SherpaPak™ group (207.7±23.3 vs. 181.6±21.9, P=0.027). SherpaPak™ kept the organ temperature at 5.1±0.8 ℃, with an average outside temperature of 21.4±3.6 ℃.Among all 21 transplanted patients four developed fatal early graft failure (28.6% vs. 21.4%, P=0.432). Over the first hours we noticed no difference in hemodynamic parameters, CK-MB levels or vasoactive-inotropic score. During first follow-up we noticed slightly better right heart function in the SherpaPak™ group (TAPSE 17.83±2.71 vs. 14.52±2.61 mm, P=0.020). We identified no positive blood cultures in the SherpaPak™ group within the first 30 days after heart transplantation. Conclusions:The SherpaPak™ provides a constant temperature during transportation with permanent monitoring, never dropping below 4 ℃.Organs transported with this novel device showed a normal perioperative function.

BackgroundThere is growing evidence from the literature that right anterior minithoracotomy aortic valve replacement (RAT-AVR) improves clinical outcome. However, increased cross clamp time is the strongest argument for surgeons not performing RAT-AVR. Rapid deployment aortic valve systems have the potential to decrease cross-clamp time and ease this procedure. We assessed clinical outcome of rapid deployment and conventional valves through RAT.MethodsSixty-eight patients (mean age 76 ± 6 years, 32% females) underwent RAT-AVR between 9/2013 and 7/2015. According to the valve type implanted the patients were divided into two groups. In 43 patients (R-group; mean age 74.1 ± 6.6 years) a rapid deployment valve system (Edwards Intuity, Edwards Lifesciences Corp; Irvine, Calif) and in 25 patients (C-group; mean age 74.2 ± 6.6 years) a conventional stented biological aortic valve was implanted.ResultsAortic cross-clamp (42.1 ± 12 min vs. 68.3 ± 20.3 min; p < 0.001) and bypass time (80.4 ± 39.3 min vs. 106.6 ± 23.2 min; p = 0.001) were shorter in the rapid deployment group (R-group). We observed no differences in clinical outcome. Postoperative gradients (R-group: max gradient, 14.3 ± 8 mmHg vs. 15.5 ± 5 mmHg (C-group), mean gradient, 9.2 ± 1.7 mmHg (R-group) vs. 9.1 ± 2.3 mmHg (C-group) revealed no differences. However, larger prostheses were implanted in C-group (25 mm; IQR 23–27 mm vs. 23 mm; IQR 21–25; p = 0.009).ConclusionsOur data suggest that the rapid deployment aortic valve system reduced cross clamp and bypass time in patients undergoing RAT-AVR with similar hemodynamics as with larger size stented prosthesis. However, larger studies and long-term follow-up are mandatory to confirm our findings.

No abstract

Background: Applying the gender lens to risk factors and outcome after adult cardiac surgery is of major clinical interest, as the inclusion of sex and gender in research design and analysis may guarantee more comprehensive cardiovascular science and may consecutively result in a more effective surgical treatment as well as cost savings in cardiac surgery. Methods: We have reviewed classical cardiovascular risk factors (diabetes, arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking) according to a gender-based approach. Furthermore, we have examined comorbidities such as depression, renal insufficiency, and hormonal influences in regard to gender. Gender-sensitive economic aspects have been evaluated, surgical outcome has been analyzed, and cardiovascular research has been considered from a gender perspective. Results: The influence of typical risk factors and outcome after cardiac surgery has been evaluated from a gender perspective, and the gender-specific distribution of these risk factors is reported on. The named comorbidities are listed. Economic aspects demonstrated a gender gap. Outcome after coronary and valvular surgeries as well as after heart transplantation are displayed in this regard. Results after postoperative use of intra-aortic balloon pump are shown. Gender-related aspects of clinical and biomedical cardiosurgical research are reported. Conclusions: Female gender has become an independent risk factor of survival after the majority of cardiosurgical procedures. Severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction independently predicts survival in men, whereas age does in females.

No abstract