Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) are responsible for bone formation during embryogenesis and bone regeneration and remodeling. The osteoinductive action of BMPs, especially BMP-2 and BMP-7, has led to their use in a range of insurmountable treatments where intervention is required for effective bone regeneration. Introduction of BMP products to the market, however, was not without reports of multiple complications and side effects. Aiming for optimization of the therapeutic efficacy and safety, efforts have been focused on improving the delivery of BMPs to lower the administered dose, localize the protein, and prolong its retention time at the site of action. A major challenge with these efforts is that the protein stability should be maintained. With this review we attempt to shed light on how the stability of BMPs can be affected in the formulation and delivery processes. We first provide a short overview of the current standing of the complications experienced with BMP products. We then discuss the different delivery parameters studied in association with BMPs, and their influence on the efficacy and safety of BMP treatments. In particular, the literature addressing the stability of BMPs and their possible interactions with components of the delivery system as well as their sensitivity to conditions of the formulation process is reviewed. In summary, recent developments in the fields of bioengineering and biopharmaceuticals suggest that a good understanding of the relationship between the formulation/delivery conditions and the stability of growth factors such as BMPs is a prerequisite for a safe and effective treatment.
Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
Therapeutic peptides and proteins show an enormous potential on the pharmaceutical market, but high costs in discovery and development are limiting factors so far. Single or multiple point mutations are commonly introduced in protein drugs to increase their binding affinity or selectivity. They can also induce adverse properties, which might be overlooked in a functional screen, such as a decreased colloidal or thermal stability, leading to problems in later stages of the development. In this study, we address the effect of point mutations on the stability of the 4.4 kDa anti-microbial peptide plectasin, as a case study. We combined a systematic high throughput biophysical screen of the peptide thermal and colloidal stability using dynamic light scattering and differential scanning calorimetry in combination with structure-based methods including small angle X-ray scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Additionally, we applied molecular dynamics simulations to link obtained protein stability parameters to the protein's molecular structure. Despite their predicted structural similarities, all four plectasin variants showed a substantially different behavior in solution. We observed an increasing propensity of plectasin to aggregate at higher pH, and the introduced mutations influenced the type of aggregation. Our strategy for systematically assessing the stability and aggregation of protein drugs is generally applicable and is of particular relevance given the increasing number of protein drugs in development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.