Background:Depression is common among long term care (LTC) residents and has a considerable impact on their quality of life. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in interventions aiming at the reduction of depression among LTC residents. These interventions could be described as formal depression care and include psychosocial interventions (e.g., Creative Arts Interventions), psychotherapeutic interventions (e.g., Life Review) and/or (neuro-)biological interventions (e.g., psychopharmacotherapy). Previous research on the effectiveness of formal depression care suggests that treatments should be more individually tailored. Tailoring treatments, however, is a time- consuming process which may hinder the implementation in LTC. A more integrative approach targeting specific groups of nursing home residents is therefore preferred and may benefit both residents and staff. To do so, insight in moderator effects is needed to better understand and better match treatments to specific groups of LTC residents.Objectives:The aim of this study is to provide insight into (1) the effectiveness of interventions, (2) the influence of residents’ characteristics (e.g., residents with cognitive impairment versus residents with physical disabilities) and/or (3) the influence of contextual factors (e.g., group-based versus individual therapy) which may have an impact on the effectiveness of interventions.Eligibility criteria:Various databases (e.g., EBSCO, PubMed, COHRANE Library) are searched using a predefined search string, combining terms concerning our PICO elements (e.g., “Nursing Home Residents” (P), “Treatment” (I), “Depression” (O)). We only include a) randomized controlled trials investigating the use of formal depression treatments (independent variable), b) among LTC residents and, c) having used a standardized measurement tool for, d) depression (dependent variable). Results of this systematic search will be presented.Method of synthesis:Eligible studies will further be screened and assessed for residents’ characteristics and/or contextual factors. A random-effects model will be used to calculate the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and to assess the strength of the effects of formal depression treatments on depression. Further subgroup-analysis and meta-regressions will be used to assess the potential moderator effects.Conclusion:To better match treatments to LTC residents, more insight into the effectiveness, moderator effects and core components of the applied interventions is needed.

Background:Depression is common among nursing home residents and has a considerable impact on their quality of life. Therefore, there has been an increased interest in interventions aiming at the reduction of depression among nursing home residents. These interventions could be categorized into formal and informal depression care. Formal care includes psychosocial, psychotherapeutic and/or (neuro-)biological interventions. Informal care can be provided by nursing home staff, alongside the formal care (e.g., letting sunlight into the room when one believes in the positive effects of daylight). Although many studies have been done about depression treatment in nursing homes, there is still a lack of insight into the effectiveness of interventions and how they differ among specific target groups (e.g., residents with cognitive impairment versus residents with physical disabilities). Moreover, research into informal care is rather rare. More insight is needed into the effect of formal and informal depression care and the mutually reinforcing effects of those strategies on nursing home residents. This insight is essential to better match treatments with residents and to provide a more comprehensive approach to counter depression.Objectives:The aim of this study is to gain insight in the use of formal and informal depression care and their associations with depression among nursing home residents.Design:A six month cohort study will be conducted.Method:Residents will be recruited in nursing homes across the Netherlands and Flanders (Belgium). To measure formal and informal care, newly developed tools will be cross-culturally validated: one to assess the provided formal care in nursing homes, two tools for measuring the used informal strategies. Depression outcomes will be measured with the Geriatric Depression Scale, Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia, and the Nijmegen-Observer-Rated Depression-scale). Baseline measurements and cross- sectional analyses will be performed and repeated after six months. The intended associations will be assessed using multiple regression analysis.Conclusion:To develop a good depression care policy, a more comprehensive approach is needed and may benefit both residents and staff.

Background:Western countries face an aging population and increasing number of people with chronic illnesses. Many countries have shifted from a focus on institutional care to home-based care due to growing healthcare costs and pressure on long-term care. Despite, the increasing difficulty for contemporary family structures to support community-dwelling older adults (CDOA) who need care.However, about 50% of households own pets which may provide some social support for CDOA. A dearth of studies investigated the support pets provide to CDOA that receive long-term care but a better understanding of pets’ support in CDOA is needed to help develop healthcare protocols and interventions that account for pets in CDOA’s lives.Research Objective:To add insight into pets’ roles in support systems and the meaning this has for CDOA.Method:This integrative review was based on qualitative studies on CDOA with pets (average age 65+). Due to few studies on CDOA with pets with chronic illnesses, this review also includes CDOA without a chronic disease. PubMed and PsycINFO, were searched with (MeSH) variations on terms of older adults, pets, and qualitative study-designs. Additionally, reference lists of systematic reviews and HABRI Central were searched. The included articles were inductively analysed in ATLAS.ti.Results:A total of 15 articles were included in the review. 28 subthemes were categorised in 7 bidirectional factors: social, care, physical health, emotional, cognitive, bonding, and behavioural. CDOA indicate that pets are very important in their lives and have a positive influence on their social environment, mental, and physical health. However, also negative aspects of pet ownership were discussed. Limitations of the review were the varying research questions and diversity of participants in the included studies. Furthermore, we identified a need in some CDOA to keep their pets as long as possible.Conclusion:This review adds a more comprehensive view on the meaning and role of pets in providing support to CDOA. However, more research is needed into the effects of the revealed factors on the wellbeing of CDOA and healthcare organisations should consider the development of guidelines accounting for the pets of long-term care clients.