The contribution of maturation and stimulation to the development of oral feeding was investigated, with two main objectives: (1) to analyze the nutritive sucking pattern of very-low-birth-weight newborns from their first oral feeding to the acquisition of independent oral feeding, and (2) to compare the nutritive sucking patterns of these babies, after feeding autonomy, with healthy term newborns. Methods: Two groups were considered for analysis. Group 1: N = 15 Very-Low-Birth-Weight (VLBW), gestacional age (GA) = 28.15 ± 1.5, birth weight (BW) = 1178.3 ± 174.4. The intervention program began at 30.19 ± 1.52 weeks GA. Group 2: N = 25 term newborns, healthy, GA = 39.04 ± 1.2, BW = 3370.42 ± 310.76. Repeated measures of the following variables were taken (weekly for group 1): suction efficacy (SEF), rhythm of milk transfer (RMT), suctions, bursts and pauses. Group 2 was analysed only once between the 2nd and 5th day of life. Results: Group 1 has revealed a minimal suction number at 32 GA weeks (82 ± 77.6) and maximal suction number at 36-37 GA weeks (162.7 ± 60.7). The number of sucks seemed to be dependent of weight (p = 0.005), duration of intervention (p = 0.001) and chronological age (p = 0.000). Significant statistical effects of gestational age were not observed (p = 0.904). Sucks in bursts represented 77% at the beginning of oral feeding (32 weeks GA), and 96% at 33 weeks GA, remaining constant thereafter. The number of sucks and bursts increased with GA and weeks of feeding. The mean duration of the pauses decreased from first to fourth week of feeding (week1 = 14.1 ± 9.1 and week4 = 6.4 ± 1.4 s). The sucking efficacy (SEF) was better explained by weight (p = 0.000), number of sucks in 5 min (p = 0.025) and chronological age (p = 0.044). Gestational age (p = 0.051) and nutritive intervention duration (NDI) (p = 0.110) did not contribute to explain SEF. Despite the observation of significant statistical differences between groups regarding GA (35.9/39.08; p = 0.00), chronological age (53.3/2.5; p = 0.00) and weight (1875/3360; p = 0.00), the nutritive suction pattern was not statistically different between groups after feeding autonomy. Conclusion: in VLBW oral feeding before 32 weeks GA allows the attainment of a mature nutritive suction pattern before term (37-40 weeks). Experience seems to be one of the influencing factors in the change of the nutritive suction pattern.
We report a rare case of hyperreactio luteinalis presenting as an incidental finding during caesarean section in an uncomplicated spontaneous singleton pregnancy. Caesarean section was performed due to failure to progress in labour, and delivered a healthy male neonate. The mother's analytical tests revealed a hyperandrogenic state without any other relevant alterations. Ovarian volume and testosterone serum concentration normalised in 2 months. The expectant management of this case permitted conservation of both ovaries in a young woman without adding morbidity.
The OECD Productivity Working Paper Series is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. OECD Productivity Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the author(s). OECD PRODUCTIVITY WORKING PAPERS The OECD Productivity Working Papers are associated with the Global Forum on Productivity that provides a forum for mutual exchange of information and fosters international cooperation between public bodies with responsibility for promoting productivity-enhancing policies, including in undertaking joint policy analysis. It offers a platform for exchanging views, experiences and information, institutional and governance arrangements and government structures, with a view towards developing better policies. The Forum extends existing work in the OECD through a well-prioritised and coherent stream of analytical work serving the policy research needs of participants on the drivers of productivity growth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.