ImportanceThe transscleral XEN Glaucoma Gel Microstent (XEN‐GGM, Allergan Plc., Parsippany, New Jersey) is implanted by a minimally invasive ab interno technique.BackgroundThe present study aims to assess the long‐term clinical outcomes in patients after XEN‐GGM implantation.DesignThis prospective, non‐randomized, multi‐centred study was conducted in three countries (Austria, Canada and Germany).ParticipantsSixty‐four consecutive eyes of 64 patients with open angle glaucoma received the XEN‐GGM (63 μm) without Mitomycin C. Thirty‐five (55%) were solo procedures, and 29 (45%) were combined with cataract surgery.MethodsVisits were planned at baseline, 6 months, 1, 2, 3 and 4 years postoperatively.Main Outcome MeasuresThe main outcome measures were mean intraocular pressure (IOP), mean number of IOP lowering medication. Secondary outcome parameters were: visual acuity, visual fields and complete surgical failure (defined as presence of a secondary IOP lowering procedure or loss of light perception) at 4 years, postoperatively.ResultsMean best‐medicated baseline IOP was 22.5 ± 4.2 mmHg and decreased significantly to 13.4 ± 3.1 mmHg 4 years postoperatively (−40%, n = 34, P < 0.001). Mean number of IOP lowering medication decreased significantly from 2.4 ± 1.3 preoperatively to 1.2 ± 1.3 (−50%, n = 34, P < 0.001) postoperatively. Visual field mean deviation showed no significant change between preoperative and postoperative examinations. Complete surgical failure rate per year was 10%.Conclusions and RelevanceThe XEN‐GGM resulted in lower IOP and a reduction in medications from baseline over 4 years of follow‐up. There was no detectable decrease in visual fields over the study. The surgical failure rate is comparable to other filtration surgeries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.