Since the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), besides vitamin-K antagonists, an additional option for stroke prevention of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is available. The objective of this study was to assess AF patients' preferences with regard to the attributes of these different treatment options. We conducted a multicenter study among randomly selected physicians. Preferences were assessed by computer-assisted telephone interviews. We used a discrete-choice-experiment (DCE) with four convenience-related treatment dependent attributes (need of bridging: yes/no, interactions with food/nutrition: yes/no, need of INR controls/dose adjustment: yes/no; frequency of intake: once/twice daily) and one comparator attribute (distance to practitioner: <1 km/>15 km). Preferences measured in the interviews were analyzed descriptively and based on a conditional logit regression model. A total of 486 AF patients (age: 73.9 ± 8.2 years; 43.2 % female; mean CHA2DS2-VASc: 3.7 ± 1.6; current medication: 48.1 % rivaroxaban, 51.9 % VKA) could be interviewed. Regardless of type of medication, patients significantly preferred the attribute levels (in order of patients' importance) "once daily intake" (Level: once = 1 vs. twice = 0; Coefficient = 0.615; p < 0.001), "bridging necessary" (yes = 1 vs. no = 0; -0.558; p < 0.001), "distance to practitioner of ≤1 km (>15 km = 0 vs. ≤1 km = 1; 0.494; p < 0.001), "interactions with food/nutrition" (yes = 1 vs. no = 0; -0.332; p < 0.001) and "need of INR controls/dose adjustment" (yes = 1 vs. no = 0; -0.127; p < 0.001). In our analyses, "once daily frequency of intake" was the most important OAC-attribute for patients' choice followed by "no bridging necessary" and "no interactions with food/nutrition". Thus, patients with AF seem to prefer treatment options which are easier to administer.

This study reports on data from a study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany examining the quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic bronchitis (CB) and its acute exacerbations (AECB). Data from 320 patients were collected at AECB and subsequently during a stable phase (non-AECB) utilizing the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP). As expected, the QoL of CB patients was poor, even at non-AECB, with patients reporting lower scores than patients with other chronic conditions. Patients reported significantly poorer QoL at AECB than at non-AECB. After adjusting for the severity of the underlying condition, poorer QoL at AECB was significantly and independently associated with older age, unemployment, increasing BMI, increasing number of prior AECBs, and Anthonisen AECB grade. While younger subjects reported significantly greater deterioration in QoL at AECB, the factors most consistently and independently associated with relative QoL deterioration at AECB were the number of prior AECBs and exposure to air pollution at home. In conclusion, this study highlights the detrimental effect of CB, and in particular AECB, on QoL. The association between QoL and patient reports of previous AECB number and air pollution are consistent with reports from other studies.

Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. Methods Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. Results Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. “Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks” showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). Conclusion This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by “route of administration,” with patients strongly preferring oral administration.

Patient approval of oral administration is governed by practical and comfort issues. In general, patients on existing oral medications are uncritical concerning a temporary additional oral medication. The clear discomfort measured in association with subcutaneous administration supports the idea that the oral route will have advantages for patient adherence. In particular this is of relevance with increasing time interval since surgery. Patients who have a very high volume of oral medications will probably profit from subcutaneous administration. The main reasons that patients gave for the preference of subcutaneous administration are based on incorrect knowledge. Therefore it is necessary to improve patient education concerning the existing alternatives for thromboprophylaxis.

The costs of chronic bronchitis have a considerable impact on the total costs of the health care system of Germany.