Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) incidence rates are increasing. From 1973 to 2009, data on all first histologically confirmed BCCs were gained from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry to estimate trends in patient-based BCC incidence rates by sex, age group, and site in the southeast Netherlands. Trends in European age-standardized rates and age- and site-specific incidence rates were assessed by calculating the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Between 1973 and 2009, the European standardized rate quadrupled from 40 to 165 per 100,000 person-years for men and from 34 to 157 for women, significantly increasing since 1973 in both sexes, but accelerating from 2002 until 2009 with an EAPC of 6.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3-8.3) for men and 7.9% (95% CI, 6.2-9.7) for women. Women below the age of 40 years exhibited a constant linear increase of 6.3% since 1973. The head and neck region was most often affected in both sexes, but the steepest increase was seen for the trunk (EAPC men 13%, women 15%). In the absence of reliable tumor-based rates, these alarming patient-based rates are probably an interesting indicator for the impact of more intensive UV exposure in a prosperous European population.
Actinic keratoses (AK) occur frequently; however, real-life clinical data on personalized treatment choice and costs are scarce. This multicentre one-year observational study investigated patient-characteristics, cost and effectiveness of methylaminolaevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT), imiquimod (IMI) and 5-fluorour-acil (5-FU) in patients with AKs on the face/scalp. A total of 104 patients preferred MAL-PDT, 106 preferred IMI and 110 preferred 5-FU. At baseline, significant differences between treatment groups were found; most patients were severely affected (mean 32.5 AK in PDT-group, 20.2 in IMI-group, 22.8 in 5-FU-group). A mean reduction in lesions of 81% after MAL-PDT, 82% after IMI and 88% after 5-FU was found after one year. Annual costs were €1,950 for MAL-PDT, €877 for IMI and €738 for 5-FU. These results show that, compared with clinical trials, in the real-life clinical setting AK patients are usually more severely affected and treatment costs are much higher. Furthermore, patient characteristics are important factors in treatment choice.
Background: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are often treated separately, lesion by lesion. However, in the past years, AKs have been described as a field disease and not limited to single clinically apparent lesions. Treatment should therefore target an area of field change which may reduce the risk of development of further AKs, second tumours, and local recurrence. Objective: The primary objective was to determine the number of new lesions at 9 months after methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy (MAL-PDT). Secondary objectives were to determine the number of new lesions at 3 and 6 months after treatment and the percentage reduction of AKs from baseline at 3, 6, and 9 months after MAL-PDT. Methods: This was a single-centre, prospective, randomized, split-face, investigator-blinded pilot study with a study duration of 1 year. The study population comprised patients with AKs on the face or scalp, with a maximum of 10 AKs on each side. One side was treated with 1 session of “lesion-by-lesion” MAL-PDT (LT side) and the other side with 1 session of field MAL-PDT (FT side). Results: At 9 months the FT demonstrated significantly fewer new lesions. At every time point during the follow-up, we found a significant reduction in the number of AKs in the LT as well as in the FT sides. After 3 and 6 months we did not observe significant differences between the sides. However, after 9 months, the LT area showed significantly fewer remaining AKs, whereas the FT area demonstrated significantly fewer new lesions. Conclusions: Field treatment results in significantly fewer new AK lesions compared with lesion-by-lesion treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.