The results imply that non-comparative measures are more appropriate in longitudinal studies and that measures without specified response options might be less suitable for an older study group. The overall impression is, however, that the different measures represents parallel assessments of subjective health.

No abstract

Swedish civil servants, who reported considerable stress while working in larger government authorities, were randomized into either a work stress reduction intervention or a control group. Four work units constituted the intervention group (n = 94). and one unit formed the control group (n = 35). Participants in the two groups were of similar age and two thirds were women. Psychosocial, lifestyle, and physiological assessments were made before, during, and after the 8-month intervention period. A significant decrease in apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A I ratio (p < 0.05) occurred in the intervention group but not in the control group. No changes were seen in either group in smoking, eating. exercise, relative weight, or other lifestyle factors. which could explain the lipid profile changes. Stimulation from and autonomy over work increased in the intervention group (p < 0.01) hut remained the same in the control group. Results have implications for the efficacy of work stress interventions in decreasing coronary risk.

No abstract

This extensive intervention programme reduced visits at emergency wards and numbers of in-patient days, which in the long run may have beneficial effects on public finances and the patient's quality of life. The study confirmed previous findings from interventions showing difficulties in influencing sick-leave rates.