A 4-year research project on 'Evaluating Environmental Risks of Biocontrol Introductions in Europe' (ERBIC) is described, and early results are presented. The project focuses on arthropod biological control (using both microbial and macrobial agents), and uses literature review, case studies with empirical work and various types of modelling to illuminate risk to non-target organisms. These methods will hopefully lead to the development of usable methodologies and guidelines for risk assessment in arthropod biological control, by the project's completion in 2002. Reviewing existing published and unpublished data on the classical biological control of insects (a first step in this project) has revealed that for only 1.5% of introductions is there some data regarding the realized field specificity of the agent. For a tiny proportion of introductions there are quantitative data regarding mortality in non-targets. From these cases, with some extrapolation, we can deduce that 10% or less of classical biological control introductions in the past led to population changes in non-targets. Data on population-level effects from simulated uses or trials suggest that 49% of inundative or augmentative uses of agents led to (local, short-term) population changes for non-targets. Case studies into: (i) exotic specialist parasitoids used in the greenhouse; (ii) exotic generalist parasitoids used inundatively in the field; (iii) exotic generalist predators used inundatively; and (iv) fungi and nematodes used as bioinsecticides, are outlined. The results so far demonstrate: (i) the apparent safety of Trichogramma (generalist parasitoid) releases in Switzerland, despite rare species within its host range; (ii) the lack of overwintering capability in northern Italy in one generalist predator (Orius insidiosis), but its presence in another (Harmonia axyridis); (iii) little evidence that the predation of certain stages of native predators by introduced predators will enhance environmental risks in the cases in question; and (iv) the apparent safety of bioinsecticide releases of particular pathogen strains for important naturally occurring predators when exposed directly or by feeding on infected prey.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

<p>Targeted precision biocontrol and improved pollination were studied Europe-wide in the EU ERA-NET CORE ORGANIC 2 project BICOPOLL (Biocontrol and Pollination). A case study was conducted on the management of strawberry grey mold <em>Botrytis cinerea</em>, with the biocontrol fungus, <em>Gliocladium catenulatum</em>, vectored by honey bees or bumble bees. A joint field trial carried out in five countries targeted strawberry cultivations in open field, and included four treatments: untreated control, chemical fungicide, entomovectored biocontrol, and chemical and biocontrol combined. In organic fields, no pesticide treatments were included. The proportion of moldy berries, and/or the marketable yield of healthy berries were recorded from each treatment, along with other parameters of local interest. A pilot study was started in Finland in 2006, and, by 2012, large commercial farms were using entomovectoring. In 2012, field trials were started in Estonia and in Italy, and in 2013-14, these experiments were expanded to Slovenia and Turkey. In total, 26 field tests were conducted using entomovectoring and <em>Gliocladium catenulatum</em> (Prestop^® Mix) on strawberry, with five additional trials on raspberry. Efficacy results have been excellent throughout the field studies. The results show crop protection equalling or exceeding that provided by a full chemical fungicide program, under all weather conditions, and over a wide geographical range (from Finland to Turkey). Under heavy disease pressure, entomovectoring provided on average a 47% disease reduction, which was the same as multiple fungicide sprays. Under light disease pressure, biocontrol decreased grey mold by an average of 66%, which was greater than fungicide sprays. The concept has proven to be effective on strawberries, raspberries, pears, apples, blueberries, cherries, and grapes. A conservative estimate for Finland is that over 500 ha of strawberry cultivation currently use the technique (≈15% of the strawberry growing area). To make full use of the entomovectoring technique, organic berry and fruit growers are encouraged to (i) keep bees, or to hire the service from local beekeepers for entomovectoring; and (ii) manage vegetation within and around the target crop to support the activity of bees and other pollinators, which can help to disseminate the beneficial microbial populations within the crop. Beekeepers are encouraged to (i) market pollination and biocontrol services to fruit and berry growers, and (ii) ensure that all operations are effective in mananging bees and their microbe dissemination activity. Biocontrol product manufacturers are encouraged to further develop products and their formulations specifically for entomovectoring, because current formulations are suboptimal as they are initially optimized for other uses (e.g., mixing into the soil).</p>