Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are enzymes responsible for degradation of cAMP and cGMP in cells. Thus, PDE inhibitors may have significant clinical benefit in respiratory diseases associated with inflammation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of selective PDE4 (rolipram, ROL) and PDE7 inhibitors (BRL50481, BRL) on citric acid-induced cough, in vivo and in vitro airway smooth muscle reactivity in both healthy and ovalbumin sensitized guinea pigs. The drugs tested were administered intraperitoneally to male guinea pigs once daily for 7 days - ROL 1 mg/kg, BRL 1 mg/kg, and ROL+BRL 0.5 mg/kg. Double chamber whole body plethysmography was used for the evaluation of citric acid (0.6 M)-induced cough and specific airway resistance. An organ bath method was used for the measurement of tracheal and lung tissue strip contractions evoked by cumulative doses (10(-8)-10(-3) mol/L) of acetylcholine (ACH) and histamine (HIS). In healthy guinea pigs, the only significant relaxation was observed after ROL in ACH-induced contractions in vitro and the effect on cough was negligible. In ovalbumin-sensitized animals, more pronounced in vitro relaxing effects of BRL in HIS-induced contractions and of combination (ROL+BRL) in ACH-induced contractions were observed, with similar results in vivo, and no significant change in the number of cough efforts was observed in any of the groups tested. The results suggest that PDE4 and PDE7 inhibitors have stronger anti-inflammatory effects compared with direct effects on smooth muscle and cough, with a potential benefit of their concomitant administration.

No abstract

Background: Procalcitonin is an inflammatory biomarker that is sensitive for bacterial infections and a promising clinical decision aid in antimicrobial stewardship programs. However, there are few studies of physicians' experiences concerning the use of PCT. The objective of this study was to investigate whether hospital physicians' experience with procalcitonin after 18 months of use can inform the PCT implementation in antimicrobial stewardship programs. Materials/methods: We deployed a qualitative approach using semi-structured interviews with 14 hospital physicians who had experience with procalcitonin in clinical practice. Interviews were audio-taped, transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Physicians reported a knowledge gap, which made them uncertain about the appropriate procalcitonin use, interpretation, and trustworthiness. Simultaneously, the physicians experienced procalcitonin as a useful clinical decision aid but emphasised that their clinical evaluation of the patient was the most important factor when deciding on antibiotic treatment. Conclusions: Procalcitonin was regarded a helpful clinical tool, but the physicians called for more knowledge about its appropriate uses. Active implementation of unambiguous procalcitonin algorithms and physician education may enhance the utility of the test as an antimicrobial stewardship adjunct.