A systematic study of two-step CIEF analysis was completed to identify key components that could be optimized to enhance the performance of mAb analysis by CIEF. Resolution between mAb isoforms was increased by selecting a narrow detector aperture, utilizing chemical rather than pressure mobilization, and improving protein solubility by incorporating urea into the carrier ampholyte (CA) solutions. Loss of the extreme pI CAs and sample components by the bidirectional ITP inherent to IEF was avoided by setting the concentration of the phosphoric acid anolyte to 200 mM and sodium hydroxide catholyte to 300 mM and by adding sufficient amounts of an acidic (pI<3) and basic (10

CIEF is a powerful separation tool utilized in the characterization and relative quantitation of therapeutic mAb charged isoforms. However, one CIEF method is not capable of separating all mAbs with high resolution and reproducibility. Optimization of sample composition and separation parameters is expected when developing a CIEF method for a specific mAb. This paper summarizes a root cause investigation into why a validated CIEF separation method for MAK33 (a type of IgG1) was no longer reproducible. In addition, this paper introduces the concept of sample focusing volume, which is defined as the actual capillary volume occupied by the sample after focusing and explains why there is less protein precipitation and aggregation when using narrow‐range ampholytes than broad‐range ampholytes. The use of DMSO as protein solubilizer and possible replacement of urea is also explored in this work. Finally, this paper demonstrates that a new optimized CIEF method can achieve over 100 reproducible high‐resolution separations of MAK33 per neutral‐coated capillary.

No abstract