Objective We present the unique administrative issues as well as specific patient and surgeon related challenges and solutions implemented while treating neurosurgical cases during the COVID pandemic vis-à-vis the pre COVID times at our tertiary care center. Methods This is a retrospective study comparing the outcome of the neurosurgical patients treated from the beginning of lockdown in India on 25 March 2020 to 30 November 2020 with that of same period in the previous year, 2019. Results We had a total of 687 admissions under neurosurgery this year during the study period as compared to 2550 admissions in 2019. The total number of surgeries done under neurosurgery also showed a similar trend with only 654 surgeries in 2020 compared to 3165 surgeries in 2019. During COVID-19 times, a total of 474 patients were operated including both trauma and non-trauma cases. Out of the 50 COVID-19 suspect/ indeterminate patients who were operated upon, 5 patients turned out to be positive for COVID-19. Significant differences were seen in the mortality (p<0.01) and morbidity (p<0.01) among trauma patients on comparing COVID and pre-COVID periods. Similarly, a significant difference was observed in the mortality (p<0.001) and morbidity (p<0.001) in non-trauma patients. Conclusions A higher mortality and morbidity during the COVID times is primarily attributable to poorer baseline clinical status. Our experience in this COVID period might not only help us in tackling subsequent waves but also help other institutions in developing world to be better prepared for the same.

During a health emergency such as the current COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, immediate access to validated information is of utmost importance. Unfortunately, unverified, unreliable, and speculative information flows at an unprecedented rate in today’s world, leading to an “infodemic.” In such a scenario, Indian states have used telephone-based health helplines to provide an effective channel for the provision of validated, accurate, and up-to-date information. We analyzed the utilization of these helplines for providing COVID-19-related information and the profile of callers handled by these helplines across 8 states of India. These helplines received more than 6.4 million calls over a period of 6 months. The volume of calls mirrored key announcements and events taking place in India as a response to the pandemic, such as the nation-wide lockdown, extension of lockdown, and so on. Nearly three quarters of the callers belonged to the economically productive age group of 20 to 59 years. The majority of the callers were males across all 8 states. The proportion of female callers was lowest in Bihar and highest in the small, hill state of Sikkim.

Nine hundred and seven polyps (mean size 3.7 mm; range 2–8) from 460 patients (mean age 67 years; range 34–94) were removed with monopolar electrocoagulation forceps (‘hot biopsy forceps’). Sixty-three percent of the polyps were adenomatous and 36% were hyperplastic. In this series there were 3 cancers and 1 neurofibroma. About 42% of the polyps were in the sigmoid-rectum region; the rest were evenly distributed in the remaining part of the colon. There were no complications. Specifically there were no cases of perforation or massive bleeding after removal of these polyps. Within the guidelines mentioned, hot biopsy removal of small colonic polyps is safe.

No abstract

Background: Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome. Objective: We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Methods: We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty. Results: On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty. Conclusions: Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.