Drs. Maurovich-Horvat, Bosserdt, and Kofoed contributed equally to this article. This article was published on March 4, 2022, at NEJM.org.

Ischemic stroke is associated with a tremendous economic and societal burden, and only a few therapies are currently available for the treatment of this devastating disease. The main therapeutic approaches used nowadays for the treatment of ischemic brain injury aim to achieve reperfusion, neuroprotection and neurorecovery. Therapeutic angiogenesis also seems to represent a promising tool to improve the prognosis of cerebral ischemia. This review aims to present the modern concepts and the current status of regenerative therapy for ischemic stroke and discuss the main results of major clinical trials addressing the effectiveness of stem cell therapy for achieving neuroregeneration in ischemic stroke. At the same time, as a glimpse into the future, this article describes modern concepts for stroke prevention, such as the implantation of bioprinted scaffolds seeded with stem cells, whose 3D geometry is customized according to carotid shear stress.

Background Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in patients with stable angina but patients often present with other forms of chest pain. The aim of this study was to compare the pre-diagnostic HRQoL in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) according to angina type, gender, and presence of obstructive CAD. Methods From the pilot study for the European DISCHARGE trial, we analysed data from 24 sites including 1263 patients (45.9% women, 61.1 ± 11.3 years) who were clinically referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA; 617 patients) or coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA; 646 patients). Prior to the procedures, patients completed HRQoL questionnaires: the Short Form (SF)-12v2, the EuroQoL (EQ-5D-3 L) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results Fifty-five percent of ICA and 35% of CTA patients had typical angina, 23 and 33% had atypical angina, 18 and 28% had non-anginal chest discomfort and 5 and 5% had other chest discomfort, respectively. Patients with typical angina had the poorest physical functioning compared to the other angina groups (SF-12 physical component score; 41.2 ± 8.8, 43.3 ± 9.1, 46.2 ± 9.0, 46.4 ± 11.4, respectively, all age and gender-adjusted p < 0.01), and highest anxiety levels (8.3 ± 4.1, 7.5 ± 4.1, 6.5 ± 4.0, 4.7 ± 4.5, respectively, all adjusted p < 0.01). On all other measures, patients with typical or atypical angina had lower HRQoL compared to the two other groups (all adjusted p < 0.05). HRQoL did not differ between patients with and without obstructive CAD while women had worse HRQoL compared with men, irrespective of age and angina type. Conclusions Prior to a diagnostic procedure for stable chest pain, HRQoL is associated with chest pain characteristics, but not with obstructive CAD, and is significantly lower in women. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02400229.

(1) Background: The prediction of recurrent events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) does not sufficiently integrate systemic inflammation, coronary morphology or ventricular function in prediction algorithms. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of inflammatory biomarkers, in association with angiographical and echocardiographic parameters, in predicting 1-year MACE after revascularized AMI. (2) Methods: This is an extension of a biomarker sub-study of the VIP trial (NCT03606330), in which 225 AMI patients underwent analysis of systemic vulnerability and were followed for 1 year. Hs-CRP, MMP-9, IL-6, I-CAM, V-CAM and E-selectin were determined at 1 h after revascularization. The primary end-point was the 1-year MACE rate. (3) Results: The MACE rate was 24.8% (n = 56). There were no significant differences between groups in regard to IL-6, V-CAM and E-selectin. The following inflammatory markers were significantly higher in MACE patients: hs-CRP (11.1 ± 13.8 vs. 5.1 ± 4.4 mg/L, p = 0.03), I-CAM (452 ± 283 vs. 220.5 ± 104.6, p = 0.0003) and MMP-9 (2255 ± 1226 vs. 1099 ± 706.1 ng/mL p = 0.0001). The most powerful predictor for MACE was MMP-9 of >1155 ng/mL (AUC-0.786, p < 0.001) even after adjustments for diabetes, LVEF, acute phase complications and other inflammatory biomarkers. For STEMI, the most powerful predictors for MACE included I-CAM >239.7 ng/mL, V-CAM >877.9 ng/mL and MMP-9 >1393 ng/mL. (4) Conclusions: High levels of I-CAM and MMP-9 were the most powerful predictors for recurrent events after AMI for the overall study population. For STEMI subjects, the most important predictors included increased levels of I-CAM, V-CAM and MMP-9, while none of the analyzed parameters had proven to be predictive. Inflammatory biomarkers assayed during the acute phase of AMI presented a more powerful predictive capacity for MACE than the LVEF.