No abstract

Objective:The purpose of the present article is to present preliminary data related to the gynecological history and current health status of pregnant refugees that reside in long-term refugee camps in Greece. Materials and Methods: The study was funded by the European program “PHILOS – Emergency health response to refugee crisis” of the Greek Ministry of Health, implemented by the Hellenic Center for Disease Control and Prevention (HCDCP), funded by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) of EU’s DG Migration and Home Affairs.Refugee pregnant women who resided in long-stay refugee camps of the mainland in Greece in 2017 were recruited. Results: Overall, 456 pregnant women were enrolled in the present study with a mean age of 27.5±6.9 years (median 27, range 17-48 years). 182 women (39.8%) were primigravidae. Mean gravidity was 2.4 (median 2, range 1-11). Among them 105 had a previous delivery, 75 women had 2 previous deliveries, 50 women had 3 previous deliveries and 14 had four previous deliveries. Of those, only six women had access to prenatal screening.Twenty-three women (5%) reported that had at least an artificial abortion performed (median 1, range 1-4) and 87 women (19.0%) had at least one spontaneous abortion (median 1, range 1-6).Two hundred and three women (44.5%) reported the use of a contraceptive method. Among them withdrawal (pull-out method) was the most prevalent accounting for almost half cases (36.9%), by followed by condom, intrauterine devices (IUD) and oral contraceptives. No differences were observed after checking the potential differences among the different age groups (p=.234). Conclusions: Refugee women that reside in long term refugee camps have limited access to national healthcare systems concerning their gynecological and obstetrical assessment. Future studies, should specifically target these problems to help structure specific healthcare plans that will ensure maternal and fetal well-being.

Background: Protection of refugees, migrants, and asylum seekers living in open hosting camps (HCs) and reception and identification centers (RICs) has been a priority since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. We present the epidemiological data of COVID-19 infection in HCs/RICs in Greece from February 2020 to May 2021, before the initiation of the onsite vaccinations.Methods: Case confirmation was performed by rapid antigenic test and/or RT-PCR. Data were retrieved from the National COVID-19 registry. The notification rate by type of accommodation facility, by sex and ethnicity and the mean age of cases, were calculated for HCs, RICs and general population. Data on clinical manifestations, and disease severity (admissions to intensive care unit (ICU) / case fatality rate) were analysed.Results: Of the 397,497 recorded domestic COVID-19 infection cases, 2,609 (0.7%) regarded HCs/RICs; of them 1,566 (60%) were identified in 27 HCs and 1,043 (40%) in six RICs. The notification rate was 542 and 380 cases per 10,000 population in HCs/RICs and the general population, respectively (p-value<0.001).Up to February 2021 the occurrence of cases in HCs/RICs did not follow the occurrence of cases in the general population. After March 2021 the course of the outbreak in HCs/RICs and the general population was similar.The median age of cases in HCs/RICs and the general population was 27 (range:0-81) and 44 (range:0-106), respectively (p<0.001). Twenty-four different ethnicities were reported among migrant cases; 51% were from Afghanistan, 13% from Syria, 6% from Kongo and 5% from Somalia.Overall, 48% and 80% of cases, respectively in HCs/RICs and the general population were symptomatic (p<0.001). Five (0.2%) cases in HCs/RICs were admitted to the ICU compared to 10,426 cases (3.0%) in the general population (p-value <0.001). Case fatality rate was 3% in the general population and 0.08% in HCs/RICs (p-value <0.001).Conclusion: Recorded COVID-19 infections were less severe in migrants living at HCs/RICs than the general population, however, the number of identified cases was high and measures for the prevention of transmission should be strengthened.