Purpose The supervisory stress test evaluates the capital adequacy and profit-generation capacity of systemic banking institutions under baseline and adverse macroeconomic scenarios. This study aims to assess the financial and informational role of European stress tests and substantiate the impact of their disclosures by examining the EU-wide 2018 stress test vis-à-vis the EU-wide 2021 stress test in terms of how and to what extent the stock prices of the stress-tested banks have been affected. Design/methodology/approach This study applies standard event study methodologies to evaluate the reactions of market participants during the EU-wide 2018 and 2021 stress test exercises. We examine several “large” events in both the exercises for a selected sample of European banks. Findings The results of our event study analysis show that the EU-wide 2018 and 2021 stress tests come subsequent to considerable abnormal price movements. The announcement of stress test results triggered tangible investor reactions, indicating the informational value of stress tests in reducing bank opacity. This supervisory “toolkit” is considered extremely important, as it provides meaningful insights to the supervisors of the banking institutions and the market stakeholders by improving the transparency of the financial sector, allowing them to segregate banks more effectively. Originality/value This study constitutes one of the earliest attempts to shed light on the financial and information role of the European supervisory stress tests by comparing the EU-wide 2018 and the EU-wide 2021 stress test exercises. Moreover, it provides concrete empirical evidence and qualitative analysis to explore certain aspects of the European and US stress tests.

Purpose This study aims to investigate the association between firm valuation and earnings quality in several European countries. Also, it examines if country-level governance and market development are important determinants of firm valuation. Design/methodology/approach Using a sample of 5,002 non-financial firms in 37 European countries over the years 2004 to 2019, the authors evaluate the research question using regression models. Findings The authors find a significant positive relationship between firm valuation and a multi-factor earnings quality measure based on four components (accruals, cash flows, operating efficiency and exclusions). The authors further show that stock market development is also a driver of firm value, while country-level governance is significant only in the case of a firm fixed effect model with time effects. The results are robust to alternative model specifications that control for endogeneity, sample heterogeneity and alternative proxies for firm valuation. Practical implications Policy makers and market participants could benefit from the findings, by exploiting the advantages of earnings quality in terms of high-ranking stocks whose earnings are backed by cash flows and other sustainable sources. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to empirically test the relationship between earnings quality and firm value in the European setting during a period that incorporates the adoption of IFRS. This is quite interesting as it permits cross-border comparability in terms of financial reporting and provides deeper and more representative evidence.