A retrospective analysis on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients ≤55 years observed at a single institution was performed with the purpose of characterizing the clinical features and outcome of young CLL and of identifying patients with different prognostic features. Over the period from 1984 to 1994, 1,011 CLL patients (204 [20%] ≤55 years of age and 807 [80%] >55 years of age) were observed. At diagnosis, younger and older patients displayed a similar distribution of clinical features, except for a significantly higher male/female ratio in younger patients (2.85 v 1.29;P < .0001). Both groups showed an elevated rate of second primary cancers (8.3% v 10.7%), whereas the occurrence of Richter’s syndrome was significantly higher in younger patients (5.9% v 1.2%; P < .00001). Younger and older patients showed a similar overall median survival probability (10 years) but were characterized by a different distribution of causes of deaths: CLL unrelated deaths and second primary malignancies predominated in the older age group, whereas the direct effects of leukemia were prevalent in the younger age group. Although younger and older patients displayed a similar survival, the evaluation of the relative survival rates showed that the disease had a greater adverse effect on the expected survival probability of the younger population. Multivariate analysis showed that for young CLL patients only dynamic parameters, such as lymphocyte doubling time and other signs of active disease, were the independent factors that significantly influenced survival probability (P = .00001). A prolonged clinico-hematologic follow-up allowed us to identify two subsets of young CLL patients with a different prognostic outcome: a group of patients (40%) with long-lasting stable disease without treatment and an actuarial survival probability of 94% at 12 years from diagnosis and another group (60%) with progressive disease and a median survival probability of 5 years after therapy. For the latter patients, the therapeutic effect of innovative therapies with curative intents needs to be investigated in prospective, comparative clinical trials.

Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) is characterized by a reciprocal 15; 17 chromosomal translocation, which fuses the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) and retinoic acid receptor α (RARα) genes, leading to the expression of the PML/RARα fusion oncoprotein. Immunocytochemical labeling of the wild-type PML protein with the PG-M3 monoclonal antibody (MoAb) directed against the amino terminal portion of the human PML gene product, produces a characteristic nuclear speckled pattern that is due to localization of the protein into discrete dots (5 to 20 per nucleus), named PML nuclear bodies. The architecture of PML nuclear bodies appears to be disrupted in APL cells that bear the t(15; 17), thus resulting in a change of the nuclear staining pattern from speckled (wild-type PML protein) to microgranular (PML-RARα fusion protein). To assess whether the PG-M3 MoAb could assist in the diagnosis of APL (M3), bone marrow and/or peripheral blood samples from 100 cases of acute nonlymphoid leukemias of different subtypes were blindly immunostained with the PG-M3 MoAb, using the immunoalkaline phosphatase (APAAP) or immunofluorescence technique as detection system. Notably, the abnormal (micropunctate) pattern of the PML/RARα fusion protein (usually ≥50 small granules/per nucleus) was observed in APL (M3) samples, but not in other types of acute nonlymphoid leukemias. Immunocytochemical labeling with PG-M3 was particularly useful in the diagnosis of microgranular variant of APL (M3V) (three cases misdiagnosed as M4 and M5), and also to exclude a morphologic misdiagnosis of APL (six of 78 cases). In all cases investigated, immunocytochemical results were in agreement with those of reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for PML/RARα. Because the epitope identified by PG-M3 is located in the aminoterminal portion of PML (AA 37 to 51), the antibody was suitable for recognizing APL cases characterized by breakpoint occurring at different sites of PML (bcr 1, bcr 2 and bcr 3). In conclusion, immunocytochemical labeling with PG-M3 represents a rapid, sensitive, and highly-specific test for the diagnosis of APL that bears the t(15; 17). This should allow an easy and correct diagnosis of this subtype of acute leukemia to any laboratory provided with a minimal equipment for immunocytochemistry work.