Fifty-two cases of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AHA) were observed within a series of 1203 patients (4.3%) with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) followed at a single institution. Nineteen were observed at the time of CLL diagnosis and 33 during the clinical follow-up. Ninety percent of the patients with CLL/AHA showed active CLL and 25% had been treated previously. The antierythrocyte autoantibody (AeAb) was an IgG in 87% of cases and an IgM in 13%. A lymphocyte count more than 60 × 109/L (P < .00001), age above 65 years (P < .01), and male gender (P < .01) emerged as independent parameters that correlated significantly with an increased rate of AHA at CLL diagnosis. Patients previously treated with chlorambucil (CB) plus prednisone (PDN) and with fludarabine plus PDN showed a similar rate of AHA (1.8% and 2.5%, respectively). After steroid therapy associated with CB in case of active CLL, 70% of patients achieved the complete disappearance of the AeAb. The actuarial AHA relapse-free survival probability was 54% at 5 years and the median survival probability after AHA was 41 months. Infections represented the main cause of morbidity and mortality. IgG AHA and the occurrence of AHA at the same time of CLL diagnosis emerged as independent factors significantly correlated with a better survival probability of AHA/CLL patients. Taken together, this study indicates that in CLL, AHA is a rare event with no independent effect on survival for which steroids, associated with CB if required, and a careful management of infections may successfully control the 2 conditions. Cooperative studies are needed to better define the optimal steroid schedule and the therapeutic role of other immunosuppressive agents and splenectomy.
A retrospective analysis on chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients ≤55 years observed at a single institution was performed with the purpose of characterizing the clinical features and outcome of young CLL and of identifying patients with different prognostic features. Over the period from 1984 to 1994, 1,011 CLL patients (204 [20%] ≤55 years of age and 807 [80%] >55 years of age) were observed. At diagnosis, younger and older patients displayed a similar distribution of clinical features, except for a significantly higher male/female ratio in younger patients (2.85 v 1.29;P < .0001). Both groups showed an elevated rate of second primary cancers (8.3% v 10.7%), whereas the occurrence of Richter’s syndrome was significantly higher in younger patients (5.9% v 1.2%; P < .00001). Younger and older patients showed a similar overall median survival probability (10 years) but were characterized by a different distribution of causes of deaths: CLL unrelated deaths and second primary malignancies predominated in the older age group, whereas the direct effects of leukemia were prevalent in the younger age group. Although younger and older patients displayed a similar survival, the evaluation of the relative survival rates showed that the disease had a greater adverse effect on the expected survival probability of the younger population. Multivariate analysis showed that for young CLL patients only dynamic parameters, such as lymphocyte doubling time and other signs of active disease, were the independent factors that significantly influenced survival probability (P = .00001). A prolonged clinico-hematologic follow-up allowed us to identify two subsets of young CLL patients with a different prognostic outcome: a group of patients (40%) with long-lasting stable disease without treatment and an actuarial survival probability of 94% at 12 years from diagnosis and another group (60%) with progressive disease and a median survival probability of 5 years after therapy. For the latter patients, the therapeutic effect of innovative therapies with curative intents needs to be investigated in prospective, comparative clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.