Background: Left cervical vagus nerve stimulation (l-VNS) is an FDA-approved treatment for neurological disorders including epilepsy, major depressive disorder, and stroke, and l-VNS is increasingly under investigation for a range of other neurological indications. Traditional l-VNS is thought to induce therapeutic neuroplasticity in part through the coordinated activation of multiple broadly projecting neuromodulatory systems in the brain. Recently, it has been reported that striking lateralization exists in the anatomical and functional connectivity between the vagus nerves and the dopaminergic midbrain. These emerging findings suggest that VNS-driven activation of this important plasticity-promoting neuromodulatory system may be preferentially driven by targeting the right, rather than the left, cervical nerve.Objective: To compare the effects of right cervical VNS (r-VNS) vs. traditional l-VNS on self-administration behavior and midbrain dopaminergic activation in rats.Methods: Rats were implanted with a stimulating cuff electrode targeting either the right or left cervical vagus nerve. After surgical recovery, rats underwent a VNS self-administration assay in which lever pressing was paired with r-VNS or l-VNS delivery. Self-administration was followed by extinction, cue-only reinstatement, and stimulation reinstatement sessions. Rats were sacrificed 90 min after completion of behavioral training, and brains were removed for immunohistochemical analysis of c-Fos expression in the dopaminergic ventral tegmental area (VTA) and substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc), as well as in the noradrenergic locus coeruleus (LC).Results: Rats in the r-VNS cohort performed significantly more lever presses throughout self-administration and reinstatement sessions than did rats in the l-VNS cohort. Moreover, this appetitive behavioral responding was associated with significantly greater c-Fos expression among neuronal populations within the VTA, SNc, and LC. Differential c-Fos expression following r-VNS vs. l-VNS was particularly prominent within dopaminergic midbrain neurons.Conclusion: Our results support the existence of strong lateralization within vagal-mesencephalic signaling pathways, and suggest that VNS targeted to the right, rather than left, cervical nerve preferentially activates the midbrain dopaminergic system. These findings raise the possibility that r-VNS could provide a promising strategy for enhancing dopamine-dependent neuroplasticity, opening broad avenues for future research into the efficacy and safety of r-VNS in the treatment of neurological disease.
Background. Anterior bridge plating with minimally invasive technique in humeral shaft fractures is reported as an acceptable, less traumatic and reproducible procedure by several authors. We have evaluated the clinical, radiological, and functional outcome of such fractures in eleven patients, all of which were managed with dynamic compression plates over an average follow-up period of 22 months. Material and methods. Forty patients with humerus shaft fractures managed by anterior bridge plating using the MIPO technique between 2014 and 2016 were included in this series. All cases were treated with closed reduction and 10-12 hole 4.5mm dynamic compression plate fixation over anterolateral aspect in bridging mode using the MIPO technique. The UCLA shoulder and Mayo elbow performance scores were used for assessing shoulder and elbow function. Results. Of the forty patients followed up for a minimum of 18 months in the study, 26 were males and 14 were females. The mean age was 34.3 years (range 20 to 53 years). 24 out of the forty patients (60%) had the dominant side fractured. The mean surgical time was 72.5 minutes (range: 45–100 minutes) and mean radiation exposure was 160 seconds (range: 100–220 seconds). The mean radiological fracture union time was 13 weeks (range: 8–18 weeks). Shoulder function based on the UCLA score was excellent to good in 33 cases (82.5%), fair in 6 cases (15%) and one patient (2.5%) developed infection for which the plate was removed prematurely at the 4th month and the wound was meticulously debrided and then managed conservatively. Road traffic accident (RTA) was the most common mode of injury, found in 27 cases; 12 patients sustained blunt trauma due to a fall; one patient sustained an injury following a direct blow by stick. Conclusions. 1. The mini-incision anterior bridge technique for humeral shaft fractures gives good functional results and should be considered an effective, cosmetically advanced surgical option in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures. 2. The mini-incision anterior bridge technique is a safe and less method for simple types of humeral shaft fractures when the surgeon is experienced in the technique.
Introduction: Tibial fractures are the most common long bone fracture. The standard of care for the treatment of diaphyseal tibial fractures is an intramedullary nail (IMN). Implant removal is one of the most common procedures in bone and joint surgery, and criteria for implant removal are typically left to the treating surgeon. We conducted a prospective study to investigate effects of intramedullary nail removal after tibial fracture union. Methods: Sixty patients at our hospital were enrolled in a prospective study and divided into moderate/severe knee pain (visual analog scale (VAS) -4) and mild/no knee pain (VAS < 4) groups after interlocking intramedullary nailing. Variables studied included the distance from the tip of the nail to the tibial plateau and the front of the tibia on a normalized lateral X-ray, the VAS score of knee and ankle pain, the range of motion of the knee and ankle, and Johner-Wruhs criteria before, 6 weeks after operation, and at the last follow-up. Results: Fifty-seven patients were followed for a mean of 8.4 (2-17) months. In patients with moderate or severe knee pain intramedullary nail removal led to significant pain reductions (p < 0.05). A significantly shorter distance from the tip of the nail to the tibial plateau (<10 mm) and the anterior border of tibia (<6 mm) was found in the 24 patients with moderate or severe knee pain. Conclusion: For patients complaining knee pain after interlocking intramedullary nailing of tibial fractures, especially with a short distance from the tip of the nail tail to the tibial plateau(<10 mm) and the anterior border of the tibia (<6 mm) removal of the intramedullary nails relieved the pain significantly.
Background. Femoral neck fractures are intracapsular hip fractures. There are several surgical implants that have been used to treat femoral neck fractures. Depuy Synthes Products and the lower extremity expert group have developed an innovative femoral neck system (FNS) for fixing femoral neck fractures. With minimally invasive procedures, FNS can provide angular stability. Materials and methods. A non-randomized single centre prospective study was conducted in 30 patients of less than 60 years of age at Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research between August 2020 to May 2022. All patients underwent internal fixation with FNS within 48 hours of presentation. Results. Although blood loss and operative time in our operated group was more than that in conventional fixation by cannulated screws, our group had better VAS scores, better Harris scores and lower complication rates. Conclusions. 1. The Femoral Neck System resulted in better biomechanical properties and good early results in femoral neck fractures. FNS gives both angular stability and rotational stability. The last follow-up in our study showed Harris score to be significantly higher, and the incidence of complications were lower. 2. The combination of FNS bolts with anti-rotation screws avoids the “Z” effect and improves the overall stability and anti-rotation effect. 3. In addition, the novel sliding compression mechanism of FNS allows the fracture ends to come in close contact with each other, benefitting fracture healing.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.