No abstract

Recent studies showed that dermorphin and enkephalin analogues containing two methyl groups at the 2',6'-positions of the Tyr(1) aromatic ring and lacking an N-terminal amino group were moderately potent delta and mu opioid antagonists. These results indicate that a positively charged N-terminal amino group may be essential for signal transduction but not for receptor binding and suggested that its deletion in agonist opioid peptides containing an N-terminal 2',6'-dimethyltyrosine (Dmt) residue may represent a general way to convert them into antagonists. In an attempt to develop dynorphin A (Dyn A)-derived kappa opioid antagonists, we prepared analogues of [Dmt(1)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH2 (1), in which the N-terminal amino group was either omitted or replaced with a methyl group. This was achieved by replacement of Tyr(1) with 3-(2,6-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid (Dhp) or (2S)-2-methyl-3-(2,6-dimethyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)propanoic acid [(2S)-Mdp]. Compounds were tested in the guinea pig ileum and mouse vas deferens bioassays and in rat and guinea pig brain membrane receptor binding assays. All analogues turned out to be potent kappa antagonists against Dyn A(1-13) and the non-peptide agonist U50,488 and showed only weak mu and delta antagonist activity. The most potent and most selective kappa antagonist of the series was [(2S)-Mdp(1)]Dyn A(1-11)-NH2 (5, dynantin), which showed subnanomolar kappa antagonist potency against Dyn A(1-13) and very high kappa selectivity both in terms of its K(e) values determined against kappa, mu, and delta agonists and in terms of its ratios of kappa, mu, and delta receptor binding affinity constants. Dynantin is the first potent and selective Dyn A-derived kappa antagonist known and may complement the non-peptide kappa antagonists norbinaltorphimine and GNTI as a pharmacological tool in opioid research.

No abstract

Recent studies suggest that ␦-opioid receptors play a role in the development of opioid tolerance and led us to hypothesize that highly selective -opioid agonists may produce less tolerance.]DALDA) has extraordinary selectivity for -receptors (K i ␦

Recently we reported using minilibraries to replace Lys(9) [somatostatin (SRIF) numbering] of the potent somatostatin agonist L-363,301 (c[-Pro-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-]) to generate the potent neurokinin receptor (NK-1) antagonist c[-Pro-Phe-D-Trp-p-F-Phe-Thr-Phe-]. This novel cyclic hexapeptide did not bind the SRIF receptor. Thus, a single mutation converted L-363,301, a SRIF agonist with potency ca. 2-8 times the potency of SRIF in laboratory animals,(24) into a selective NK-1 receptor antagonist with an IC(50) of 2 nM in vitro. During the screening of the same libraries for ligands of the delta-opioid receptor, we identified four compounds (1-4) which represent a new class of delta-opioid antagonists, some of which were also NK-1 receptor antagonists. The most potent delta-opioid antagonist, c[-Pro-1-Nal-D-Trp-Tyr-Thr-Phe-] (2), showed a K(e) value of 128 nM in the mouse vas deferens assay and a delta-receptor binding affinity constant of 152 nM in the rat brain membrane binding assay. These results are of interest because they represent a novel class of delta-opioid antagonists and, like two previously reported delta-opioid antagonists, they lack a positive charge. To examine further the requirement for a positive charge in the delta-opioid ligands, we prepared two analogues of the beta-casomorphin-derived mixed mu-agonist/delta-antagonist, H-Dmt-c[-D-Orn-2-Nal-D-Pro-Gly-] (7), in which we eliminated the positive charge either through formylation of the primary amino group (5) or by the deletion of this N-terminal amino group (6). These latter compounds proved to be delta-opioid antagonists with K(e) values in the 16-120 nM range, as well as fairly potent mu-opioid antagonists (K(e) approximately 200 nM). These six compounds provide the most convincing evidence to date that there is no requirement for a positive charge in mu- and delta-opioid receptor antagonists. In addition, cyclic hexapeptide 4 lacks a phenolic hydroxyl group. Taken together, these data suggest that the prevailing assumptions about delta- and mu-opioid receptor binding need revision and that the receptors for these opioid ligands have much in common with the NK-1 and somatostatin receptors.