Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) constitutes a B cell-derived neoplasm defined by a scarce tumoral population, termed Hodgkin and Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells, submerged into a histologically heterogeneous microenvironment. The paucity of HRS cells has historically hampered genetic studies, rendering the identification of the recurrent genetic lesions and molecular pathways deregulated in this lymphoma difficult. The advent of high-throughput sequencing methods such as next-generation sequencing (NGS) could sensibly optimize the identification of the mutational landscape of cHL. However, there is no current consensus either in the design of panels for targeted NGS or in its most relevant clinical applications. In this work, we systematically review the current state of NGS studies of cHL, stressing the need for standardization both in the candidate genes to be analyzed and the bioinformatic pipelines. As different institutions have developed and implemented their own customized NGS-based protocols, to compare and systematically review the major findings of this ongoing research area could be of added value for centers that routinely perform diagnostic, monitoring and genotyping strategies in cHL samples. The results of this systematic review should contribute to the interdepartmental harmonization and achievement of a consensus in the current clinical applications of NGS studies of cHL.
The prognostic impact of the presence of Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) in classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is controversial. Previous studies reported heterogeneous results, rendering difficult the clinical validation of EBV as a prognostic biomarker in this lymphoma. The objective of this study was to evaluate the survival impact of the expression of EBV Latent-Membrane Protein 1 (EBV-LMP1) in tumoral Hodgkin–Reed–Sternberg (HRS) cells of primary diagnostic samples of cHL. Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) lymph node samples from 88 patients with cHL were analyzed. Patients were treated with the standard first-line chemotherapy (CT) with Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by radiotherapy. The Kaplan–Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model were used for carrying out the survival analysis. In order to investigate whether the influence of EBV was age-dependent, analyses were performed both for patients of all ages and for age-stratified subgroups. In bivariate analysis, the expression of EBV was associated with older age (p = 0.011), mixed cellularity subtype cHL (p < 0.001) and high risk International Prognostic Score (IPS) (p = 0.023). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were associated with the presence of bulky disease (p = 0.009) and advanced disease at diagnosis (p = 0.016). EBV-positive cases did not present a significantly lower OS and PFS in comparison with EBV-negative cases, for all ages and when stratifying for age. When adjusted for covariates, absence of bulky disease at diagnosis (HR: 0.102, 95% CI: 0.02–0.48, p = 0.004) and limited disease stages (I–II) (HR: 0.074, 95% CI: 0.01–0.47, p = 0.006) were associated with a significant better OS. For PFS, limited-disease stages also retained prognostic impact in the multivariate Cox regression (HR: 0.145, 95% CI: 0.04–0.57, p = 0.006). These results are of importance as the early identification of prognostic biomarkers in cHL is critical for guiding and personalizing therapeutic decisions. The prognostic role of EBV in cHL could be modulated by the type of CT protocol employed and interact with the rest of presenting features.
Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) constitutes the most frequent lymphoma in young adults. Its histopathology is unique as a scattered tumor population, termed Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells is diluted in a prominent tumor microenvironment (TME) composed of T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils and histiocytes. Traditionally, the identification of prognostic biomarkers in the cHL TME has required visual inspection and manual counting by pathologists. The advent of whole-slide imaging (WSI) and digital image analysis methods could significantly contribute to improve this essential objective in cHL research, as a 10-20% of patients are still refractory or relapsed after conventional chemotherapy. In this work, we have digitized a total of 255 diagnostic cHL slides and quantified the proportion of HRS cells (CD30), B cells (CD20) and T cells (CD3) by digital image analysis. Data obtained where then correlated with the overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) of cHL patients. Quantification of HRS cells, B cells and T cells reflects the biological heterogeneity of the different cHL histological subtypes analyzed. A percentage of 2.00% of HRS cells statistically significantly discriminated between patients achieving a complete metabolic response (CMR) and refractory or relapsed (R/R) patients both for the OS (P=0.001) and PFS (P=0.005). Furthermore, patients with a percentage of T cells below the 26.70% in the TME showed a statistically significantly shorter OS (P=0.019) and PFS (P=0.041) in comparison with patients above this threshold. A subgroup of patients with a low content of T cells and high content of HRS cells exhibited a special aggressive clinical course. Currently, there is the need to implement quantitative and easy scalable methods to enhance clinical translation, as the cHL TME plays a central role in the clinical course of the disease. The results of this study could contribute to the identification of prognostic biomarkers specifically looking at the cHL TME and their inclusion in future clinical trials.
Integration of WSI and NGS in classic Hodgkin lymphoma identifies a higher PFS in patients with CD3+ and MUM1+ cell abundance and amplification in the NF1 gene, and cHL patients with MUM1+ cell abundance and amplification in the AR gene and wild-type KRASS gene.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.