Calcipotriol cream plus PUVA clearly reduces the cumulative dose of UVA and improves the response of psoriasis vulgaris to PUVA.

Medical treatment of meningiomas is reserved for cases in which surgery and radiotherapy have failed. Given that a high percentage of meningiomas express somatostatin receptors, treatment with somatostatin analogues has been proposed. In addition, these medications have been shown to have an antiproliferative and antiangiogenic effect in vitro. To date, very few cases with clinical response and none with radiological response have been described. The case described here is the first to report a radiological response. A 76-year-old Caucasian male was first diagnosed with unresectable meningioma at age 47. The patient experienced multiple recurrences and underwent three surgeries and radiotherapy over the years from the initial diagnosis. Despite treatment, the disease continued its progression. Based on an Octreoscan positive for tumour uptake, therapy with extended-release somatostatin analogues was started. Although no clinical neurological improvement was observed, magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a discreet but continuous radiological response over time. After >2 years of continuous administration of lanreotide, the patient remains progression free. In highly selected cases, somatostatin analogue treatment for meningioma may be beneficial. Based on our findings, treatment with somatostatin analogues should be maintained longer than previously described before evaluating treatment response.

Background:The antisynthetase syndrome (SAS) is characterized by the presence of antisynthetase antibodies, anti-JO1, PL7 y PL12 are the most common; and the classic triad of myositis, arthritis, and diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD)1. Most patients present incomplete forms and the severity of the ILD determines the prognosis of the disease2.Objectives:to analyze epidemiological, clinical and serological characteristics and treatments used in a cohort of patients with SAS.Methods:descriptive study of review of medical records. Data were collected from 15 patients with SAS followed in the Rheumatology and Pneumology consultations of the Virgen Macarena Hospital (Seville) in the last 10 years. The analysis was carried out using the R software.Results:15 patients were included, 8 men and 7 women. The median age was 56 years (33-77). Seven patients (47%) used to smoke. Four patients (27%) met the classical triad. All of them presented ILD and 8 patients (53%) had arthritis and / or myositis. Five (33%) had mechanic’s hands and six of them (40%) presented Raynaud. Seven (47%) suffered from dyspnea before the SAS diagnosis. The median diagnostic delay was 1 month (0-43). Seven (47%) patients had anti-JO1, 1 (7%) anti-PL7, 2 (13%) anti-PL12 and 2 (13%) patients anti-Ro52. Radiological patterns detected by HRCT were: 5 (33%) NINE, 4 (37%) NIU and 6 (40%) others. The initial treatment included mostly (66%) glucocorticoids (GC) and one or more cFAME. In maintenance, mycophenolate was used in 7 patients (47%), cyclosporine 5 (33%), cyclophosphamide in 3 cases (20%), azathioprine in 3 patients (20%) and methotrexate in 3 of them (20%). Four (37%) patients required a combination of DMARDs and 2 cases needed (13%) biological therapy, Rituximab and Tocilizumab. Changes in the mean value of the initial respiratory function tests (FVC1 and DLCO1) and during follow-up (FVC2 and DLCO2) were not relevant (FVC1 81.5% [42-110], FVC2 81% [59-115]; DLCO1 83% [10-112], DLCO2 80.5% [47-108]). Nine patients (60%) remained clinically stable and 3 patients (20%) progressed radiologically. Four patients died from ILD progression.Conclusion:In this study, the incomplete diagnosis of SAS predominated. The most detected antibody was anti-JO1. ILD is present in all cases, with NINE being the most frequent pattern so multidisciplinary management is necessary. Most used treatments were GC and FAMES combined, some cases required biological therapy.References:[1]Irazoque F, et al. Epidemiology, etiology and classification. Reumatol Clin. 2009;5:2-5.[2]Johnson C, et al. Clinical and pathologic differences in interstitial lung disease based on antisynthetase antibody type. Respir Med. 2014; 108(10):1542-8.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:There are no RA response predictors for our patients. The decision to initiate a first biological depends on multiple factors such as rheumatologist experience, clinical characteristics of the patient and health system. What is clear is that the best strategy is T2T.Objectives:To know the clinical characteristics and persistence of the first biological DMARD in patients receiving bDMARDS TNF inhibitors vs DMARDs aimed at other targets.Methods:A observational cohort of adult RA patients (ACR/EULAR 2010) in a rheumatology department of a third-level university hospital. All patients were treated with a first bDMARD marketed in Spain, from 2010 to December 2020 and prescribed according to product data sheet. Biological drugs were divided into TNF inhibitors drugs (adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab, certolizumab) and Other targets (abatacept, rituximab, sarilumab, tocilizumab). Clinical data, duration of treatment and EULAR response were collected from each patient. The data were analyzed with descriptive, bivariate statistics and survival analysis adjusted for age, sex, FR, erosions and duration of the disease.Results:Data were collected from 332 patients (table 1). Patients treated with other target bDMARDs were mostly female, with higher activity, shorter disease duration, and treated without MTX.b Survival graphs showed that regardless of the target chosen as fist bDMARD, EULAR response rates and persistence to the drug were similar.Table 1.VariableTNF inhibitorsn=194Other targetsn = 138Totaln =332pn (%)n (%)n (%)0.02Female142 (73)115 (83)257 (77)0.2FR +163 (82)121 (88)284 (86)0.6ACPA +125 (63)84 (61)209 (63)0.9Erosions177 (89)80 (58)257 (77)0.01Concomitant MTX153 (77)62 (47)215 (65)0.003EULAR response Good103 (77)67 (71)170 (75)0.2 Moderate24 (18)16 (17)40 (17) No7 (5)11 (11)18 (8)Mean ± SDMean ± SDMean ± SDAge (years)55.7 ± 13.357.6 ± 11.956.5 ± 12.70.1Evolution of RA (years)9.6 ± 10.27.5 ± 7.58.7 ± 9.20.04Persistence (months)19.3 ± 20.516.07 ± 15.1117.5 ± 18.50.04DAS28VSG4V basal5.02 ± 1.55.59 ± 1.035.25 ± 1.30.001DAS28VSG4V final2.68 ± 1.12.84 ± 1.42.7 ± 1.250,31Conclusion:Patients receiving Anti-TNF vs bDMARD with other mechanisms of action have clinical differences. However, the response and persistence to the drug are similar, perhaps due to the implementation of the correct T2T strategy.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Background:Diffuse interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)1,2. The most common pattern is the usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP), conditioning a worse prognosis3.Objectives:To describe epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics and treatment used in a cohort of patients diagnosed with RA and ILD.Methods:Retrospective descriptive study, including patients with a diagnosis of RA and ILD, reviewed in the Rheumatology and Pneumology consultations of the Virgen Macarena University Hospital, from 2010 to 2019. Data obtained from medical records are analyzed. SPSS statistical software is used.Results:26 patients were included, 18 women (69.2%). Median age at diagnosis of ILD was 62 years (53-73). Twelve patients (46.6%) used to smoke. The mean time from RA diagnosis to ILD diagnosis was 79 months (8-264). The RF was positive in 91.3% cases (21) and 87% of them (20) were ACPA positive. Fourteen patients (53.8%) had erosions and 3 (11.5%) had an associated Sjögren’s Syndrome. When ILD was diagnosed, the RA activity by DAS28PCR was moderate (3.28; 2.34-3.28) and 13 patients (54.1%) suffered from dyspnea. The mean value of FVC and DLCO in the first assessment was 84% (63-108) and 71.7% (64-86), respectively. The most frequent radiological pattern of ILD was NINE in 15 patients (57.7%), 6 of them (23.1%) had UIP and 5 (19.3%) presented other patterns. Prior to ILD diagnosis, 24 (92.3%) patients received oral glucocorticoids, 18 (69.2%) cases started treatment with c-DMARD and 11 (42.3%) of them with b-DMARD; the most widely used were methotrexate (MTX) in 17 patients (65.4%) and anti-TNFα in 10 (38.5%). After diagnosis, treatment was changed to 12 patients (46.6%); the most used DMARD was leflunomide, in 11 (42.3%), MTX was maintained in 7 patients (26.9%); the number of anti-TNFα used decreased to 4 cases (15.4%), using instead drugs such as rituximab 5 (19.2%), abatacept 3 (11.5%), baricitinib 2 (7.7%) and anti-IL6 2 (7, 7%). During follow-up, 11 cases (57.9%) remained radiologically stable. A slight deterioration in DLCO was observed (66%; 51-80) and there was one death due to lung disease (UIP).Conclusion:In this study, the most frequent radiological pattern was NINE. Half of the patients used to smoke. At the diagnosis of ILD (at ILD diagnosis), dyspnea was the most relevant clinical symptom, with a slight deterioration in the? respiratory function tests. This represented a change in the therapeutic strategy.References:[1]Olson AL, Swigris JJ, Sprunger DB, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis-interstitial lung disease-associated mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183:372-78.[2]Fragoulis GE, Nikiphorou E, Larsen J, Korsten P and Conway R. Methotrexate-Associated Pneumonitis and Rheumatoid Arthritis-Interstitial Lung Disease: Current Concepts for the Diagnosis and Treatment. Front. Med. 2019;6:238.[3]Tanaka N, Kim JS, Newell JD, et al. Rheumatoid arthritis-related lung diseases: CT findings. Radiology. 2004;232:81-91.Disclosure of Interests:None declared