Incidence, predictors and prognostic significance of thromboembolic disease in patients with advanced ALKrearranged non-small cell lung cancer To the Editor: Thromboembolic disease is fairly common in patients with lung cancer [1-3]. This incidence seems to be higher in patients with lung adenocarcinomas [4], with approximately 15% of those with advanced stage disease developing venous thromboembolisms (VTE) during the whole course of their disease [5-7]. Pulmonary adenocarcinomas are a heterogeneous group of diseases that can be stratified according to the presence of major oncogenic driver alterations. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements are detected in approximately 4% of these cases [8]. Isolated reports have suggested that patients bearing ALK-rearranged tumours might have a higher than expected incidence of thromboembolisms [9, 10]. In the present study, we have analysed the incidence, predictors and prognostic significance of thromboembolic events in a large, multi-institutional and homogeneous cohort of advanced stage patients with ALK-rearranged lung cancers from Spain and Portugal. Our primary objective was to estimate the incidence of thromboembolic events and their association with overall survival in these patients. A centralised institutional ethics committee approval at the 12 de Octubre University Hospital valid for all Spanish centres, and an institutional ethics committee approval at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto, were obtained before the study was initiated. We retrospectively selected all consecutive patients diagnosed with advanced stage (stages III and IV) ALK fusion positive non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) between January 2012 and December 2016. Data were contributed by 29 Medical Centres from Spain and one from Portugal. ALK positivity was determined according to local standard protocols in each institution. We excluded patients with neuroendocrine tumours and patients on therapeutic doses of anticoagulants prior to advanced stage cancer diagnosis. We defined a thromboembolic event as any venous or arterial thromboembolism, documented by imaging studies, that occurred at the time or after advanced stage cancer diagnosis. In addition to thromboembolic events, collected during the whole patients' follow-up period, we collected baseline information (within 1 month of advanced stage cancer diagnosis) of several clinical and analytical variables of interest. We included 241 ALK-rearranged NSCLCs in this study. The median age was 56 years (range 17-84 years). Half of the patients were never smokers (52%), and most had stage IV pulmonary adenocarcinomas (n=204, 85%). Baseline brain and liver metastasis were detected in 22% and 25% of the patients, respectively. 17 patients (7%) and 185 patients (77%) had high and intermediate Khorana risk scores (KRS) [11] respectively. The median follow-up of our study population was 19 months (range 0-59 months), and 127 (53%) of the patients died. The median follow-up of alive patients was 30 months (range 4-49 months). The est...

Although there is published research on the impact of venous thromboembolism (VTE) on quality of life (QoL), this issue has not been thoroughly investigated in patients with cancer—particularly using specific questionnaires. We aimed to examine the impact of acute symptomatic VTE on QoL of patients with malignancies. This was a multicenter, prospective, case-control study conducted in patients with cancer either with (cases) or without (controls) acute symptomatic VTE. Participants completed the EORTC QLQ-C30, EQ-5D-3L, PEmb-QoL, and VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaires. Statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in terms of global health status were examined. Between 2015 and 2018, we enrolled 425 patients (128 cases and 297 controls; mean age: 60.2 ± 18.4 years). The most common malignancies were gastrointestinal (23.5%) and lung (19.8%) tumors. We found minimally important differences in global health status on the EQ-5D-3L (cases versus controls: 0.55 versus 0.77; mean difference: −0.22) and EORTC QLQ-C30 (47.7 versus 58.4; mean difference: −10.3) questionnaires. There were minimally important differences on the PEmb-QoL questionnaire (44.4 versus 23; mean difference: −21.4) and a significantly worse QoL on the VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire (42.7 versus 51.7; mean difference: −9). In conclusion, we showed that acute symptomatic VTE adversely affects the QoL of patients with malignancies.

Background. Data on the incidence, etiology, and prognosis of non-ventilator-associated pneumonia in hospitalized patients with solid tumors are scarce. We aimed to study the characteristics of non-ventilator-associated pneumonia in hospitalized patients with solid tumors. Materials and Methods. This was a prospective noninterventional cohort study of pneumonia in patients hospitalized in an oncology ward in a tertiary teaching hospital. Pneumonia was defined according to the American Thoracic Society criteria. Patients were followed for 1 month after diagnosis or until discharge. Survivors were compared with nonsurvivors. Results. A total of 132 episodes of pneumonia were diagnosed over 1 year (9.8% of admissions to the oncology ward). They were health care-related (67.4%) or hospital-acquired pneumonia (31.8%). Lung cancer was the most common malignancy. An etiology was established in 48/132 episodes (36.4%). Knowing the etiology led to changes in antimicrobial therapy in 58.3%. Subsequent intensive care unit admission was required in 10.6% and was linked to inappropriate empirical therapy. Ten-day mortality was 24.2% and was significantly associated with hypoxia (odds ratio [OR], 2.1). Thirty-day mortality was 46.2%. The independent risk factors for 30-day mortality were hypoxia (OR, 3.3), hospital acquisition (OR, 3.1), and a performance status >1 (OR, 2.6). Only 40% of patients who died within 30 days were terminally ill. Conclusion. Pneumonia is a highly prevalent condition in hospitalized patients with solid tumors, even with nonterminal disease. Etiology is diverse, and poor outcome is linked to inappropriate empirical therapy. Efforts to get the empirical therapy right and reach an etiological diagnosis to subsequently de-escalate are warranted. The Oncologist 2020;25:e861-e869Implications for Practice: The present study shows that pneumonia is a prevalent infectious complication in patients admitted to oncology wards, with a very high mortality, even in non-terminally ill patients. Etiology is diverse, and etiological diagnosis is reached in fewer than 40% of cases in nonintubated patients. Intensive care unit admission, a marker of poor outcome, is associated with inappropriate empirical therapy. These results suggest that, to improve prognosis, a more precise and appropriate antimicrobial empirical therapy for pneumonia in patients with solid tumors is necessary, together with an effort to reach an etiological diagnosis to facilitate subsequent de-escalation.

No abstract

No abstract