Background:Neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) is treated with antimuscarinics as first-line treatment. For patients with contraindications or unresponsive, intradetrusor injections with botulinum toxin (BoNT) are a safe and effective but expensive option.Study Question:Our study evaluated whether adding solifenacin to the intradetrusor injection of BoNT A could boost the effect of BoNT in patients with NDO due to multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury refractory to antimuscarinics alone and/or lead to less frequent injections.Study Design:We performed a prospective study on 49 patients assigned alternatively to group A, undergoing BoNT injections, and group B, adding solifenacin.Measures and Outcomes:We gathered data from urodynamic testing and questionnaire assessments before and 3 months after injections and reinjections. We analyzed 39 patients who achieved total continence and a minimum 24-month follow-up period.Results:After treatment, both groups had statistically significant improvement of overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq) score, post void residue (PVR), and peak detrusor pressure (Pdet). Reinjection was needed after a mean 8.2 months for group A and 11.7 months for group B. We analyzed the improvement rate of parameters compared between the 2 groups—group B had greater OABq score improvement (A = 17.25 ± 5.07, B = 20.44 ± 4.51, P = 0.0485), as well as for maximum bladder capacity (A = 11.05 ± 7.04 mL, B = 19.39 ± 6.43 mL, P = 0.0005); differences in Pdet change (A = 51.72 ± 16.57 cmH2O, B = 50.80 ± 16.33 cmH2O, P = 0.7635) and PVR change (A = 17.67 ± 12.63 mL, B = 12.30 ± 8.32 mL, P = 0.126) were not statistically significant.Conclusions:Our study shows that adding solifenacin improves patient satisfaction, increases the interval between reinjections, thus lowering costs, and improves maximum bladder capacity. Pdet was kept in safe ranges, but no statistically significant conclusions could be drawn regarding Pdet and PVR decrease related to adding solifenacin. Although our study is limited by the small series of patients and lack of randomization and placebo control group, the BoNT–solifenacin combination could be considered in NDO in terms of cost-effectiveness. Further studies would be beneficial.

No abstract

No abstract

Our aim is to analyse the bone profile in adults with (non-functioning) adrenal incidentalomas (AIs), specifically addressing the impact of autonomous cortisol secretion (ACS). This narrative review, based on a PubMed search from inception to February 2023 (case reports, non-ACS, and other secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded), included 40 original studies, a total of 3046 patients with female prevalence (female:male ratio of 1921:1125), aged between 20.5 and 95.5 years old. This three decade-based analysis showed that 37 studies provided dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) information; another five studies reports results on bone micro-architecture, including trabecular bone score (TBS), spinal deformity index, and high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography; 20 cohorts included data on bone turnover markers (BTMs), while four longitudinal studies followed subjects between 1 and 10.5 years old (surgical versus non-adrenalectomy arms). Post-dexamethasone suppression test (DST) cortisol was inversely associated with bone mineral density (BMD). TBS predicted incidental vertebral fractures (VFx) regardless of BMD, being associated with post-DST cortisol independently of age and BMD. Low BTMs were identified in ACS, but not all studies agreed. An increased prevalence of ACS-related osteoporosis was confirmed in most studies (highest prevalence of 87.5%), as well as of VFx, including in pre-menopause (42.5%), post-menopause (78.6%), and male patients (72.7%) depending on the study, with a 10-fold increased incidental VFx risk up to a 12-fold increased risk after a 2-year follow-up. No specific medication against osteoporosis is indicated in ACS, but adrenalectomy (according to four studies) should be part of the long-term strategy. This bone profile case sample-based study (to our knowledge, one of the largest of its kind) showed that AIs, including the subgroup designated as having ACS, embraces a large panel of osseous complications. The level of evidence remains far from generous; there are still no homogenous results defining ACS and identifying skeletal involvement, which might be a consequence of different investigation clusters underling adrenal and bone assessments over time. However, bone status evaluations and associated therapy decisions remain an essential element of the management of adults with AIs-ACS.