AIMTo perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) therapy and the risk of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).METHODSWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed and seven other databases through January 1990 to March 2017 for published studies that evaluated the association between PPIs and CDI. Adult case-control and cohort studies providing information on the association between PPI therapy and the development of CDI were included. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random effect. Heterogeneity was assessed by I2 test and Cochran’s Q statistic. Potential publication bias was evaluated via funnel plot, and quality of studies by the Newcastle-Otawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS).RESULTSFifty-six studies (40 case-control and 16 cohort) involving 356683 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. Both the overall pooled estimates and subgroup analyses showed increased risk for CDI despite substantial statistical heterogeneity among studies. Meta-analysis of all studies combined showed a significant association between PPI users and the risk of CDI (pooled OR = 1.99, CI: 1.73-2.30, P < 0.001) as compared with non-users. The association remained significant in subgroup analyses: by design-case-control (OR = 2.00, CI: 1.68-2.38, P < 0.0001), and cohort (OR = 1.98, CI: 1.51-2.59, P < 0.0001); adjusted (OR = 1.95, CI: 1.67-2.27, P < 0.0001) and unadjusted (OR = 2.02, CI: 1.41-2.91, P < 0.0001); unicenter (OR = 2.18, CI: 1.72-2.75, P < 0.0001) and multicenter (OR = 1.82, CI: 1.51-2.19, P < 0.0001); age ≥ 65 years (OR = 1.93, CI: 1.40-2.68, P < 0.0001) and < 65 years (OR = 2.06, CI: 1.11-3.81, P < 0.01). No significant differences were found in subgroup analyses (test for heterogeneity): P = 0.93 for case-control vs cohort, P = 0.85 for adjusted vs unadjusted, P = 0.24 for unicenter vs multicenter, P = 0.86 for age ≥ 65 years and < 65 years. There was significant heterogeneity across studies (I2 = 85.4%, P < 0.001) as well as evidence of publication bias (funnel plot asymmetry test, P = 0.002).CONCLUSIONThis meta-analysis provides further evidence that PPI use is associated with an increased risk for development of CDI. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to assess whether this association is causal.

Although a considerable number of studies support a substantial increase in incidence, severity, and healthcare costs for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), only few evaluate its impact on IBD outcome. Medline and several other electronic databases from January 1993 to October 2013 were searched in order to identify potentially relevant literature. Most of the studies showed that IBD patients with CDI present a greater proportion of worse outcomes than those without CDI. These patients have longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of colectomies, and increased mortality. Patients with ulcerative colitis are more susceptible to CDI and have more severe outcomes than those with Crohn's disease. However, studies reported variable results in both short- and long-term outcomes. Contrasting results were also found between studies using nationwide data and those reporting from single-center, or between some North-American and European studies. An important limitation of all studies analyzed was their retrospective design. Due to contrasting data often provided by retrospective studies, further prospective multi-center studies are necessary to evaluate CDI impact on IBD outcome. Until then, a rapid diagnosis and adequate therapy of infection are of paramount importance to improve IBD patients' outcome. The aim of this article is to provide up to date information regarding CDI impact on outcome in IBD patients.

Worldwide, the leading cause of chronic liver disease is represented by nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) which has now become a global epidemic of the 21st century, affecting 1 in 4 adults, and which appears to be associated with the steadily increasing rates of metabolic syndrome and its components (obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and dyslipidemia). NAFLD has been reported to be associated with extrahepatic manifestations such as cardiovascular disease, T2DM, chronic kidney disease, extrahepatic malignancies (e.g., colorectal cancer), endocrine diseases (e.g., hypothyroidism, polycystic ovarian syndrome, psoriasis, and osteoporosis), obstructive sleep apnea, and iron overload. The prevalence of NAFLD is very high, affecting 25–30% of the world population and encloses two steps: (1) nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL), which includes steatosis only, and (2) nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) defined by the presence of steatosis and inflammation with hepatocyte ballooning, with or without fibrosis which can progress to liver fibrosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver transplantation. Current data define a more complex relationship between NAFLD and T2DM than was previously believed, underlining a bidirectional and mutual association between the two entities. This review aims to summarize the current literature regarding the incidence of T2DM among patients with NAFLD and also the prevalence of NAFLD in T2DM patients, highlighting the recent key studies. Clinicians should screen, diagnose, and treat T2DM in patients with NAFLD in order to avoid short- and long-term complications.

No abstract